Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One underreported part of the CWM experience is how much time they all spend at Water Country IUSA and Busch Gardens. Busch Gardens is open every weekend except in January and that’s very popular.
How much time they all spend? Not buying it. Occasionally, maybe.
Busch Gatdens is expensive. I doubt college kids are hoping over there every weekend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One underreported part of the CWM experience is how much time they all spend at Water Country IUSA and Busch Gardens. Busch Gardens is open every weekend except in January and that’s very popular.
How much time they all spend? Not buying it. Occasionally, maybe.
Anonymous wrote:One underreported part of the CWM experience is how much time they all spend at Water Country IUSA and Busch Gardens. Busch Gardens is open every weekend except in January and that’s very popular.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smart, independent minded, creative, studious, sporty: all types. Go visit when students are on campus then go visit UVA. UVA has a lot of people who dress exactly alike, especially females, and wear the same hairstyle. WM does not have the “sheeple” vibe. Uniqueness and individuality are celebrated. The SAT ranges preTO were almost identical: both had 25% above 1480-90 at that time. So both have smart kids , yet neither had the 75% or more above 1480 that the ivy/stanford group had at the time. That makes a more balanced undergraduate group where bright kids can shine rather than be buried by 3x as many bright ones. At least that’s what we sought for ours. YMMV
UVA and VT rejects attend W&M.
Anonymous wrote:Smart, independent minded, creative, studious, sporty: all types. Go visit when students are on campus then go visit UVA. UVA has a lot of people who dress exactly alike, especially females, and wear the same hairstyle. WM does not have the “sheeple” vibe. Uniqueness and individuality are celebrated. The SAT ranges preTO were almost identical: both had 25% above 1480-90 at that time. So both have smart kids , yet neither had the 75% or more above 1480 that the ivy/stanford group had at the time. That makes a more balanced undergraduate group where bright kids can shine rather than be buried by 3x as many bright ones. At least that’s what we sought for ours. YMMV