Anonymous wrote:So what is the process? Just give a survey and reflect whatever it says? Are the people filling these out doing so subjectively, based on outdated stereotypes rather than current data or trends?
Here is what USNWR says:
“Peer assessment: This is a measure of how a school is regarded by top administrators at other institutions and accounts for qualitative attributes of schools that may not be fully captured by the other ranking factors. A school's peer assessment score is calculated from the weighted, two-year rolling average of ratings on academic quality it received by presidents, provosts and deans of admissions – or officials in equivalent positions – at institutions submitting a peer assessment survey administered by U.S. News.
Each survey respondent was asked to rate the overall academic quality of peer schools' undergraduate academic programs on a 5-point scale: outstanding (5), strong (4), good (3), adequate (2) or marginal (1). For example, schools in the National Universities ranking could only rate any of the other schools in the National Universities ranking. Respondents who did not know enough about a school to evaluate it fairly were asked to mark "don't know" or leave it blank, neither of which counted for or against a school's score.
U.S. News collected the most recent data by administering peer assessment surveys to schools in spring and summer 2024. Of the 4,665 academics who were sent questionnaires, 30.7% responded. The peer assessment response rate in 2024 for National Universities was 41% and for National Liberal Arts Colleges was 47%.“