Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t understand why someone would make their kid spend an extra year in school and at home for a perceived marginal advantage in a sport.
If your kid is having serious academic, social or emotional issues, sure. If not, you really need to reassess your priorities.
I know of several baseball family who do it. Maybe there is an advantage in baseball so they can make the HS baseball team then hopefully college?
well baseball isn't soccer. kids playing soccer have to be on a club team to get recruited and clubs go by birth year. kids playing baseball, basketball or football can get recruited just by playing high school sports so holding them back might be an advantage
Football yes. Basketball and baseball travel more and farther and those AAU and travel teams are where the recruiting happens. The exception are the private schools in the area like Dematha like Paul VI that recruit athletes to come play. You're not playing public school sports and getting recruited for any sport except football in today’s world.
People say how soccer is different and needs to be fixed here. But really soccer in the US is similar to every other sport with clubs, pay to play, etc. Except football which truly is unique because it’s the most popular sport here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t understand why someone would make their kid spend an extra year in school and at home for a perceived marginal advantage in a sport.
If your kid is having serious academic, social or emotional issues, sure. If not, you really need to reassess your priorities.
I know of several baseball family who do it. Maybe there is an advantage in baseball so they can make the HS baseball team then hopefully college?
well baseball isn't soccer. kids playing soccer have to be on a club team to get recruited and clubs go by birth year. kids playing baseball, basketball or football can get recruited just by playing high school sports so holding them back might be an advantage
Football yes. Basketball and baseball travel more and farther and those AAU and travel teams are where the recruiting happens. The exception are the private schools in the area like Dematha like Paul VI that recruit athletes to come play. You're not playing public school sports and getting recruited for any sport except football in today’s world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t understand why someone would make their kid spend an extra year in school and at home for a perceived marginal advantage in a sport.
If your kid is having serious academic, social or emotional issues, sure. If not, you really need to reassess your priorities.
I know of several baseball family who do it. Maybe there is an advantage in baseball so they can make the HS baseball team then hopefully college?
well baseball isn't soccer. kids playing soccer have to be on a club team to get recruited and clubs go by birth year. kids playing baseball, basketball or football can get recruited just by playing high school sports so holding them back might be an advantage
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t understand why someone would make their kid spend an extra year in school and at home for a perceived marginal advantage in a sport.
If your kid is having serious academic, social or emotional issues, sure. If not, you really need to reassess your priorities.
I know of several baseball family who do it. Maybe there is an advantage in baseball so they can make the HS baseball team then hopefully college?
Anonymous wrote:We were looking at the roster of a top college men's soccer team during a game that was recently on TV. A lot of the players, maybe even most, had played in the USL for a couple of years prior to joining the college team. I don't think redshirting is going to make much of a difference if the key to getting recruited is playing in a pro league first.
Anonymous wrote:In college soccer the kids are all fully grown so it doesn't really matter if they are a year older or younger. Their playing ability is what matters.
As far as holding a kid back just for some possible advantage in the younger years? There is just as good a chance that not holding them back gives them more advantage. Maybe the players on the team are better or worse, or it means having a different coach, or they won't be challenged enough at an early age, or too much, or there are social issues by being older or younger than teammates.
The point is it's impossible to foresee how delaying a year will impact a single child. If you are considering it just for soccer maybe you should re-evaluate your priorities.
Anonymous wrote:I can’t understand why someone would make their kid spend an extra year in school and at home for a perceived marginal advantage in a sport.
If your kid is having serious academic, social or emotional issues, sure. If not, you really need to reassess your priorities.
Anonymous wrote:Is there an advantage of redshirting a player in soccer? Looks like not, they risk of being the trapped kid being 8th grade instead of playing HS at 9th grade. How about college? Does that increase or decrease the chances of playing college soccer.