Anonymous
09/26/2024 01:13
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
It's T14 but not T4.
Anonymous
09/26/2024 01:10
Subject: Re:Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
All that matters is its T14. But you knew that.
Anonymous
09/26/2024 01:03
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous
09/26/2024 01:02
Subject: Re:Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous wrote:Duke Law has been ranked in the top 10 since the early 90s.
https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/wilsons-rp27.pdf
Incorrect. It started slipping in the 2000s.
Duke 9 9 9 7 8 10 10 8 8 10 10 12 12 10 11 11 10 12 10
Anonymous
09/26/2024 00:54
Subject: Re:Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Duke Law has been ranked in the top 10 since the early 90s.
Anonymous
09/26/2024 00:49
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I’ve noticed this thing with college rankings and it appears that the universities we consider to be “top” are top because of specifically business and law school rankings ( medical school is a different). With the exception of a handful of privates like Johns Hopkins or Rice, along with the ivies of Princeton and Brown, most universities derive their reputations primarily from just these two subjects. Take UVA for example. Historically, it is not well known in either stem or humanities quite frankly. Just compare their department rankings in economics or history to the more historically prestigious Michigan and Wisconsin. But, UVA is seen as comparable and even better than those two, based purely on business and law schools. Furthermore, undergraduate selectivity seems to be primarily generated through competitive pre law/pre-mba finance bros.
You're mistaken. Quite a few "elite" American universities don't have top tier business or law schools - Princeton, CalTech, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Brown, West Point, Annapolis, Williams, Amherst, Carnegie Mellon to name a few.
I'll grant you UVA though. Excellent law and business school.
And some are really well known in one graduate field and not the other. Or don't do it. Like Dartmouth and business. But no law school.
Duke currently has the #4 Law School and #12 business school according to U.S. News.
No one in law actually considers Duke a top 4 law school. harvard, yale, stanford, penn, chicago, northwestern, michigan, NYU, boalt, all out class it. This shows in the entering class stats as well.
Anonymous
09/26/2024 00:19
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I’ve noticed this thing with college rankings and it appears that the universities we consider to be “top” are top because of specifically business and law school rankings ( medical school is a different). With the exception of a handful of privates like Johns Hopkins or Rice, along with the ivies of Princeton and Brown, most universities derive their reputations primarily from just these two subjects. Take UVA for example. Historically, it is not well known in either stem or humanities quite frankly. Just compare their department rankings in economics or history to the more historically prestigious Michigan and Wisconsin. But, UVA is seen as comparable and even better than those two, based purely on business and law schools. Furthermore, undergraduate selectivity seems to be primarily generated through competitive pre law/pre-mba finance bros.
You're mistaken. Quite a few "elite" American universities don't have top tier business or law schools - Princeton, CalTech, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Brown, West Point, Annapolis, Williams, Amherst, Carnegie Mellon to name a few.
I'll grant you UVA though. Excellent law and business school.
And some are really well known in one graduate field and not the other. Or don't do it. Like Dartmouth and business. But no law school.
Duke currently has the #4 Law School and #12 business school according to U.S. News.
Since most of the top law schools refuse to submit data anymore to USNWR, I’d take that current ranking with a grain of salt.
Anonymous
09/26/2024 00:14
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Michigan is comparable in law and business to UVA. It’s better than UVA in just about everything else. That you feel it is better than Michigan is your regional bias.
Anonymous
09/26/2024 00:07
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I’ve noticed this thing with college rankings and it appears that the universities we consider to be “top” are top because of specifically business and law school rankings ( medical school is a different). With the exception of a handful of privates like Johns Hopkins or Rice, along with the ivies of Princeton and Brown, most universities derive their reputations primarily from just these two subjects. Take UVA for example. Historically, it is not well known in either stem or humanities quite frankly. Just compare their department rankings in economics or history to the more historically prestigious Michigan and Wisconsin. But, UVA is seen as comparable and even better than those two, based purely on business and law schools. Furthermore, undergraduate selectivity seems to be primarily generated through competitive pre law/pre-mba finance bros.
You're mistaken. Quite a few "elite" American universities don't have top tier business or law schools - Princeton, CalTech, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Brown, West Point, Annapolis, Williams, Amherst, Carnegie Mellon to name a few.
I'll grant you UVA though. Excellent law and business school.
And some are really well known in one graduate field and not the other. Or don't do it. Like Dartmouth and business. But no law school.
Duke currently has the #4 Law School and #12 business school according to U.S. News.
Anonymous
09/26/2024 00:03
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I’ve noticed this thing with college rankings and it appears that the universities we consider to be “top” are top because of specifically business and law school rankings ( medical school is a different). With the exception of a handful of privates like Johns Hopkins or Rice, along with the ivies of Princeton and Brown, most universities derive their reputations primarily from just these two subjects. Take UVA for example. Historically, it is not well known in either stem or humanities quite frankly. Just compare their department rankings in economics or history to the more historically prestigious Michigan and Wisconsin. But, UVA is seen as comparable and even better than those two, based purely on business and law schools. Furthermore, undergraduate selectivity seems to be primarily generated through competitive pre law/pre-mba finance bros.
I don't know where yale would be without their law school
New Haven
I disagree with this general sentiment though. It isn't shocking that great universities with strong general reputations and a ton of $$ also tend to have very good professional schools. Only Harvard and Stanford seem to be at the very top in every department, grad school, and professional school. Even places like MIT and Princeton have weaknesses upon closer consideration.
Top liberal arts colleges like Amherst, Swarthmore, and Williams clearly don't follow fit in either.
Anonymous
09/25/2024 23:52
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous wrote:So I’ve noticed this thing with college rankings and it appears that the universities we consider to be “top” are top because of specifically business and law school rankings ( medical school is a different). With the exception of a handful of privates like Johns Hopkins or Rice, along with the ivies of Princeton and Brown, most universities derive their reputations primarily from just these two subjects. Take UVA for example. Historically, it is not well known in either stem or humanities quite frankly. Just compare their department rankings in economics or history to the more historically prestigious Michigan and Wisconsin. But, UVA is seen as comparable and even better than those two, based purely on business and law schools. Furthermore, undergraduate selectivity seems to be primarily generated through competitive pre law/pre-mba finance bros.
You're mistaken. Quite a few "elite" American universities don't have top tier business or law schools - Princeton, CalTech, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Brown, West Point, Annapolis, Williams, Amherst, Carnegie Mellon to name a few.
I'll grant you UVA though. Excellent law and business school.
And some are really well known in one graduate field and not the other. Or don't do it. Like Dartmouth and business. But no law school.
Anonymous
09/25/2024 23:31
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
What’s your basis for this claim? USNWR rankings are for undergraduate programs. Law schools have their own separate rankings. I don’t think a law school ranking directly correlates to the same school’s undergrad ranking or reputation. If someone didn’t go to law school, I don’t assume something about their undergrad degree based on that college’s law school program (that would make no sense).
Anonymous
09/25/2024 22:53
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Anonymous wrote:So I’ve noticed this thing with college rankings and it appears that the universities we consider to be “top” are top because of specifically business and law school rankings ( medical school is a different). With the exception of a handful of privates like Johns Hopkins or Rice, along with the ivies of Princeton and Brown, most universities derive their reputations primarily from just these two subjects. Take UVA for example. Historically, it is not well known in either stem or humanities quite frankly. Just compare their department rankings in economics or history to the more historically prestigious Michigan and Wisconsin. But, UVA is seen as comparable and even better than those two, based purely on business and law schools. Furthermore, undergraduate selectivity seems to be primarily generated through competitive pre law/pre-mba finance bros.
I don't know where yale would be without their law school
Anonymous
09/25/2024 22:02
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
Michigan's law and business schools are ranked right with UVA.
Anonymous
09/25/2024 21:58
Subject: Top universities are “top” essentially because of professional schools?
So I’ve noticed this thing with college rankings and it appears that the universities we consider to be “top” are top because of specifically business and law school rankings ( medical school is a different). With the exception of a handful of privates like Johns Hopkins or Rice, along with the ivies of Princeton and Brown, most universities derive their reputations primarily from just these two subjects. Take UVA for example. Historically, it is not well known in either stem or humanities quite frankly. Just compare their department rankings in economics or history to the more historically prestigious Michigan and Wisconsin. But, UVA is seen as comparable and even better than those two, based purely on business and law schools. Furthermore, undergraduate selectivity seems to be primarily generated through competitive pre law/pre-mba finance bros.