Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
Based on what? Your deep analysis done during a few college visits? The depth of critical thinking here is really sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
They’re also overwhelmingly liberal and from non-tech majors. Cater essays accordingly.
YES I have noticed that as well. It's an interesting data point.
Anonymous wrote:Our school hosted a panel with eight AOs, mostly well-known/brand-name schools plus a couple of in-state. They gave the expected answers to questions like, how do you view test scores, using AI in essays, that kind of thing. My big takeaway: the AOs mostly seemed well-meaning but frankly not all that bright. It was like, oh, THIS is who makes these big decisions about my kid? Frankly one that stood out as most impressive was the in-state rep. Anyway, I'm not sure what my point is, it's not like I really thought AOs were a bunch of Harvard MBAs but it was still eye-opening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
They’re also overwhelmingly liberal and from non-tech majors. Cater essays accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:I think they're bright (enough) and professional, but I also think college admissions is all vibes.
It's like one 9th grade English teacher grading one paper (plus clubs, job, etc) .. it says something about the kids work, but it's half the teacher you were assigned to.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.