Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
If you want the real info without sources questionable or otherwise, you can do ya bit of googling and find original paper and the website it plagiarized. Baltimore Banner reported it but it is behind a paywall.
No, if it's serious, it will be in WaPo at some point. They're good with this sort of thing. Nothing that you've said is credible enough at this point, OP. Doesn't mean it's not true! But it means you don't quite understand how investigative journalism works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
NP. It's all over google.
Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
If you want the real info without sources questionable or otherwise, you can do ya bit of googling and find original paper and the website it plagiarized. Baltimore Banner reported it but it is behind a paywall.
Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
Anonymous wrote:https://dbknews.com/2024/09/18/pines-denies-plagiarism-accusations/
The degree of intentional copying is, unlike some recent high profile cases, NOT minor and cannot be chalked up to an unintentional mistake due to carelesses. He (and his coauthor) copied nearly a 1/3 of his 5000 word academic paper from an Australian student's website in 2002 with no credit to the real author. He only changed the spelling from Australian convention to American spelling. If you look at side by side comparisons, there can be no doubt about plagiarism. Clearly unethical, clearly cheating. Any undergrad student, or even high school student, should know better. He should acknowledge he made a serious error of judgment and step down immediately, and the university needs to stop defending him.
Anonymous wrote:He hasn't painted a target on his back, and he had a co-author who can be potentially thrown under the bus.
I doubt that this kind of thing ever happens just once, so if nothing else gets turned up in the next couple of months, he's almost certainly OK. If it *does* get turned up... still a chance to survive. Unlike the Ivy Leaguers, he hasn't painted a target on his back, and it was one of Ew, Those People who pointed out the plagiarism. Academics are very tribal, and it's not all that hard to get them to confuse hatred of the messenger with hatred of the message.