Anonymous wrote:I think it's cute that they're pretending it's because internal polling says he doesn't need to, as opposed to because he was a disaster!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone got a link?
If you just google it, you find a lot of articles. But here's a link.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/12/trump-refuses-harris-debate-again-00178933
Anonymous wrote:I’m glad. America doesn’t need another debate. One is more than enough.
Anonymous wrote:The first debate probably killed his chances of being elected.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4875745-frank-luntz-donald-trump-kamala-harris-debate/
Republican pollster Frank Luntz predicted former President Trump’s performance in the Tuesday night debate will ultimately cost him the election in November.
Another debate will definitely put the final nail in the coffin, it the first one didn't.
He can't afford to debate her again.
Republican pollster Frank Luntz predicted former President Trump’s performance in the Tuesday night debate will ultimately cost him the election in November.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone got a link?