Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think a single short stint is a problem on a resume with otherwise long term stays.
But I don’t think your resume has long term stays. If I saw your resume, I would see three short stints and one borderline long term job that I would wonder if it was long enough to vest in you as an employee.
That said, I work in an industry with high entrance requirements and knowledge requirements, and most hires don’t start to bring value until the two year mark. If you’re in a career where you bring any value for a three year stint, my best advice is to find a better skill set - because otherwise you’ll be unemployable by 45.
This is silly. It's entirely industry dependent. Even senior ppl in tech are viewed as getting stale if they stay longer than 4 years.
Great example. Because tech is infamous as the least friendly industry to people over age 50. By 45, you’re getting stale. So year, two year job hops for 20 years in tech, and you’re pretty unemployable. Hence the suggestion to pick another industry.
Or don’t be surprised when you can find a job at age 45.