Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love solar, but your takeaways are flawed.
1. What do you think Competitive Renewable Energy Zones are, if not regulation?
2. This article is about big solar fields, which create other problems. CA, a geographically smaller state, is still ahead in solar when you count rooftop solar which doesn't have the same transmission issues and open space reduction as large scale arrays.
I'm glad they're doing solar and wind, just "free market" is not why it's happening.
Big solar arrays make more sense in Texas as there are vast areas of useless open space Rooftop solar makes sense.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.axios.com/2024/09/06/solar-power-generation-texas
Biggest wind energy producer by far, biggest solar producer, second in batteries… thanks to less regulation and the free market.
Anonymous wrote:I love solar, but your takeaways are flawed.
1. What do you think Competitive Renewable Energy Zones are, if not regulation?
2. This article is about big solar fields, which create other problems. CA, a geographically smaller state, is still ahead in solar when you count rooftop solar which doesn't have the same transmission issues and open space reduction as large scale arrays.
I'm glad they're doing solar and wind, just "free market" is not why it's happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Solar is just a money laundering scam. Look who is behind most of it.
Wind power is marginal at best, transmission is the main problem among the other obvious ones.
Geothermal is good on a local level, but also has drawbacks.
Less electric demand is the only solution long-term speaking.
How can you say that? What’s wrong with you?
We’re trying to convince the public to go all-electric for everything, and then you hit them with “the only answer is reduced demand”? What the hell?
You’re not going to convince anyone to change their lifestyle by telling them it’ll mean doing with less than they have today. That’s not how it works.
Anonymous wrote:Solar is just a money laundering scam. Look who is behind most of it.
Wind power is marginal at best, transmission is the main problem among the other obvious ones.
Geothermal is good on a local level, but also has drawbacks.
Less electric demand is the only solution long-term speaking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Solar is just a money laundering scam. Look who is behind most of it.
Wind power is marginal at best, transmission is the main problem among the other obvious ones.
Geothermal is good on a local level, but also has drawbacks.
Less electric demand is the only solution long-term speaking.
This hasn’t been true in a long time. Solar and onshore wind are already competitive on their merits and combined with batteries offer a viable path to a largely renewable powered grid. (Totally decarbonised if you add new nuke capacity into the mix.)
Batteries. Holy fire hazard and toxic waste dump afterwards Batman!
They are aren't they? So many people killed and so many wildfires started by lithium batteries. Wouldn't have an EV at all.
Oh no! That is so scary!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Solar is just a money laundering scam. Look who is behind most of it.
Wind power is marginal at best, transmission is the main problem among the other obvious ones.
Geothermal is good on a local level, but also has drawbacks.
Less electric demand is the only solution long-term speaking.
This hasn’t been true in a long time. Solar and onshore wind are already competitive on their merits and combined with batteries offer a viable path to a largely renewable powered grid. (Totally decarbonised if you add new nuke capacity into the mix.)
Batteries. Holy fire hazard and toxic waste dump afterwards Batman!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Solar is just a money laundering scam. Look who is behind most of it.
Wind power is marginal at best, transmission is the main problem among the other obvious ones.
Geothermal is good on a local level, but also has drawbacks.
Less electric demand is the only solution long-term speaking.
This hasn’t been true in a long time. Solar and onshore wind are already competitive on their merits and combined with batteries offer a viable path to a largely renewable powered grid. (Totally decarbonised if you add new nuke capacity into the mix.)
Anonymous wrote:Solar is just a money laundering scam. Look who is behind most of it.
Wind power is marginal at best, transmission is the main problem among the other obvious ones.
Geothermal is good on a local level, but also has drawbacks.
Less electric demand is the only solution long-term speaking.