Anonymous wrote:It's not country over party. It's realignment of parties. I said this years ago on this board and was told I didn't know what I was talking about, however it's only gotten more clear. At a high level overview, it's war-loving neocon establishment (D) vs anti-war anti-establishment (R).

Can you illuminate us as to which wars were started under the Biden Administration?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I strongly disagree with her political ideology but at least she has some semblance of ethics and integrity, which is so sorely lacking in the remainder of the GOP.

If she had ethics and integrity, she would have questioned some of the activities of the J6 committee on which she served. She didn't.

Which activities?

What is going on? Did she endorse Harris? Cryptic thread

Cheney was horrified - like many of us - that Trump tried to overthrow our government. Why Trump supporting dipshits aren’t horrified is a mystery unless they simply hate liberals more than they love our country.

So, a simple but brave decision by Cheney. Support people like Harris and Walz who love the U.S. even if they have what you regard as misguided policies. Oppose Trump who will burn this country down if he perceives an ounce of gain for himself.

Anonymous wrote:It's not country over party. It's realignment of parties. I said this years ago on this board and was told I didn't know what I was talking about, however it's only gotten more clear. At a high level overview, it's war-loving neocon establishment (D) vs anti-war anti-establishment (R).

Actually, it's the party nominating an insurrectionist felon (R) vs. a career prosecutor (D). The Democrats are now the Law and Order party.

It's not country over party. It's realignment of parties. I said this years ago on this board and was told I didn't know what I was talking about, however it's only gotten more clear. At a high level overview, it's war-loving neocon establishment (D) vs anti-war anti-establishment (R).

Anonymous wrote:I strongly disagree with her political ideology but at least she has some semblance of ethics and integrity, which is so sorely lacking in the remainder of the GOP.

+1

Anonymous wrote:I strongly disagree with her political ideology but at least she has some semblance of ethics and integrity, which is so sorely lacking in the remainder of the GOP.

If she had ethics and integrity, she would have questioned some of the activities of the J6 committee on which she served. She didn't.

I strongly disagree with her political ideology but at least she has some semblance of ethics and integrity, which is so sorely lacking in the remainder of the GOP.

YES!

https://x.com/robreiner/status/1831480735439712351

Anonymous wrote:Thank you for putting Country Over Party.

Could you please for the love of god link to whatever it is you're talking about?

Where does she vote...Virginia? Wyoming? The people who might actually make a difference seem like they are either sitting this one out (Pat Toomey) or voting for Trump (Richard Burr).

She’s a war hack. Trump is far better than her

Thank you for putting Country Over Party.