Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And there goes the low income students!
My guess is they will also be giving poor students a preference in admissions.
That is what MIT did and their pell grant students went from 20% to 24% of the entering class.
I don't really see why this is any more a fair system. I get that poor people aren't a protected class, but it is ridiculous that we attempt to correct education at the finish line.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And there goes the low income students!
My guess is they will also be giving poor students a preference in admissions.
That is what MIT did and their pell grant students went from 20% to 24% of the entering class.
I don't really see why this is any more a fair system. I get that poor people aren't a protected class, but it is ridiculous that we attempt to correct education at the finish line.
This! All resources must be applied at the primary/secondary education levels. Admission to college should be on the same standard for everyone with minor exceptions for culturally ingrained BS like sports and legacy. Subsidize those that can't pay tuition but that shouldn't be a factor in admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And there goes the low income students!
My guess is they will also be giving poor students a preference in admissions.
That is what MIT did and their pell grant students went from 20% to 24% of the entering class.
I don't really see why this is any more a fair system. I get that poor people aren't a protected class, but it is ridiculous that we attempt to correct education at the finish line.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And there goes the low income students!
My guess is they will also be giving poor students a preference in admissions.
That is what MIT did and their pell grant students went from 20% to 24% of the entering class.
Anonymous wrote:And there goes the low income students!
Anonymous wrote:Common sense shall prevail.
Anonymous wrote:Didn’t they announce this in June?