Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
And what if the kid is unhappy with those living conditions? Would it still be ridiculous?
Anonymous wrote:For those who were able to get more than half custody, assuming the other spouse wanted half, what did it take?
If there was emotional abuse towards the child and both physical and emotional towards the mother how and what did you document?
My friend did speak to a few attorneys but they said that emotional abuse towards children is hard to prove and has to be horrendous to really matter much in family court.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
It's common. The children get higher priority than the parents. Parent gets visitation rights if they aren't willing to provide for their children in custody.
https://www.thelenlaw.com/blog/2021/04/how-living-accommodations-could-impact-child-custody/#:~:text=Separate%20rooms,rule%20that%20every%20court%20follows.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
Yes, and that wouldn't fly where I am. In many places, 50/50 is presumed. It would take something like documented abuse of the child (like, medically/state documented) to not have it if both parties want it.
That's great if its not like that where you live but the reality is its like that in most places.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
Its not to that poster. They didn't work so they needed the extra child support and alimony as income. And, to keep the house. Sounds like she screwed over the ex big time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
Yes, and that wouldn't fly where I am. In many places, 50/50 is presumed. It would take something like documented abuse of the child (like, medically/state documented) to not have it if both parties want it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.
That's ridiculous and not a reason to keep the kids from their other parent.
Anonymous wrote:Ex had one bedroom apartment, and judge preferred to see kids in their own home with separate bedrooms. I was a SAHM too, so I offered more stability.