Bloviate much?Anonymous wrote:The top 15 seems to be pretty consistent. It's the usual suspects. Duke seems a little high. And I don't know why Columbia and Penn are ranked relatively low, but it may be bc of the inclusion of the SLACs distorting things. Without Pomona, CMC, Wellesley, Amherst and Williams, Columbia and Penn would be 17 and 18, which seems fine. I do think the SLACs should have a separate list. There's usually not much overlap in applicants.
Anonymous wrote:SAT/ACT Test Scores - 20%
Acceptance Rate - 10%
Student to Faculty Ratio - 12%
Instruction Expenditures Per Student - 15%
Graduation Rate - 18%
Student Debt - 10%
Post Graduation Income - 15%
I see nothing wrong woth this, it's actually a better methodology than USnews. SAT/ACT scores should be more than just 5% of a college ranking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shockingingly no publics make the top 40, mainly because of LACs. Refreshing to see a ranking that doesn't kiss their behinds.
Yeah, suck it public universities! How dare they harbor any notions of prestige while educating the huddled masses and producing world-class research and scholarship.
Anonymous wrote:Shockingingly no publics make the top 40, mainly because of LACs. Refreshing to see a ranking that doesn't kiss their behinds.