Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact is, a stadium is going to go there. The question is, will it be surrounded by surface parking lots, or can it be nestled into a new development that extends the L'Enfant street grid and is wrapped in housing and retail?
It can be done - look at European cities for examples.
If the city absolutely needs a football stadium (which it needs as much as it needs Mayor Bowser, which is to say that it would be better off without one), Poplar Point is a much better location. It clusters the stadiums together and would anchor the development of the east bank of the Anacostia. The location is more accessible also.
Anonymous wrote:The fact is, a stadium is going to go there. The question is, will it be surrounded by surface parking lots, or can it be nestled into a new development that extends the L'Enfant street grid and is wrapped in housing and retail?
It can be done - look at European cities for examples.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact is, a stadium is going to go there. The question is, will it be surrounded by surface parking lots, or can it be nestled into a new development that extends the L'Enfant street grid and is wrapped in housing and retail?
It can be done - look at European cities for examples.
If the city absolutely needs a football stadium (which it needs as much as it needs Mayor Bowser, which is to say that it would be better off without one), Poplar Point is a much better location. It clusters the stadiums together and would anchor the development of the east bank of the Anacostia. The location is more accessible also.
Anonymous wrote:The fact is, a stadium is going to go there. The question is, will it be surrounded by surface parking lots, or can it be nestled into a new development that extends the L'Enfant street grid and is wrapped in housing and retail?
It can be done - look at European cities for examples.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.axios.com/local/washington-dc/2024/08/22/rfk-stadium-commanders-football-study?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axioslocal_dc&stream=top
The Mayor has moved forward with a 2nd stadium study, even though the local community vehemently opposes. Why do they even hold community meetings if they aren't going to listen to residents?!
Anonymous wrote:https://www.axios.com/local/washington-dc/2024/08/22/rfk-stadium-commanders-football-study?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axioslocal_dc&stream=top
The Mayor has moved forward with a 2nd stadium study, even though the local community vehemently opposes. Why do they even hold community meetings if they aren't going to listen to residents?!
Anonymous wrote:https://www.axios.com/local/washington-dc/2024/08/22/rfk-stadium-commanders-football-study?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axioslocal_dc&stream=top
The Mayor has moved forward with a 2nd stadium study, even though the local community vehemently opposes. Why do they even hold community meetings if they aren't going to listen to residents?!
Anonymous wrote:https://www.axios.com/local/washington-dc/2024/08/22/rfk-stadium-commanders-football-study?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axioslocal_dc&stream=top
The Mayor has moved forward with a 2nd stadium study, even though the local community vehemently opposes. Why do they even hold community meetings if they aren't going to listen to residents?!
Anonymous wrote:Because politicians are bought and paid for by developers and special interests. This mayor in particular loves developers. Constituents' opinions of their neighborhood don't matter.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.axios.com/local/washington-dc/2024/08/22/rfk-stadium-commanders-football-study?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axioslocal_dc&stream=top
The Mayor has moved forward with a 2nd stadium study, even though the local community vehemently opposes. Why do they even hold community meetings if they aren't going to listen to residents?!