Because Israel is always the victim. Didn't you know? And the world has a moral obligation to perpetuate that victimhood and not object to whatever Israel decides is in its best interest.

As far as I am concerned the moral obligation the world assumed after WWII has been fulfilled. they should be left to sink or swim on their own.

Israel always throws the rock and hides the hand. They are literally testing Palestinians patience there.

Settlers have burned down another village today and overall killed over 600 Palestinians in the West Bank since 10/7 and hundreds more before that.
Why not let the West Bank be? By push it to resort to extremism to counter the settler extremism?

Israeli settlements are a PR and strategic disaster for war planning too. Israeli settlers and their kids there are practically human shields there if Hamas or any other Palestinians embed themselves in the settlements.

Israeli settlers are committing terrorism, using bombs, and killing palestenians that live there. This is excluding the seizure of land and homes. Hammas isn't in the West bank. So what justifies this?

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/8/16/pure-terrorism-world-reacts-to-israeli-settler-attack-in-west-bank