Anonymous wrote:Are some of these schools far plane rides
for students and esp if you are not in a sport with a chartered plane?

That was definitely one of the biggest concerns raised when this crazy expansion happened. There's going to have to be some really careful and intentional scheduling to make it work for everything else besides the football teams.

Anonymous wrote:Are some of these schools far plane rides
for students and esp if you are not in a sport with a chartered plane?

Pretty sure the B1G is going to have to set up a central facility the region around Iowa of Nebraska for teams to play in non revenue sports probably round Robin multi day type events.

There needs to be a University of New England to grab that whole region of 6 states

Are some of these schools far plane rides
for students and esp if you are not in a sport with a chartered plane?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big Ten Conference does not want either U Arizona or U Colorado. Will result in diminished value for the entire conference.

The Big Ten Conference wants Notre Dame, Texas A&M, and UNC.

Notre Dame for sure. Not Texas A&M .. it’s not the flagship. UNC is a smaller school with fewer alumni and state politics won’t let them leave larger and more represented in the state assembly NC state behind in the bag of dicks ACC or Big 12.

Uva has the same problem with VT. The state isn’t going to let Uva dust VT.

I can see a situation where UNC, NC state, Uva , VT, FSU, Clemson, Miami, Kansas, Iowa State, Kansas State, Stanford, Cal, Washington State, Oregon State, Arizona State, Texas Tech, West Virginia,Utah , BYU and Duke

Create the new “big 20” conference

Love the commercial and original song!

ND, sure.

UNC brings nothing to the table to justify further splitting the $$$$ pie.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big Ten Conference does not want either U Arizona or U Colorado. Will result in diminished value for the entire conference.

The Big Ten Conference wants Notre Dame, Texas A&M, and UNC.

Notre Dame for sure. Not Texas A&M .. it’s not the flagship. UNC is a smaller school with fewer alumni and state politics won’t let them leave larger and more represented in the state assembly NC state behind in the bag of dicks ACC or Big 12.

Uva has the same problem with VT. The state isn’t going to let Uva dust VT.

Anonymous wrote:Big Ten Conference does not want either U Arizona or U Colorado. Will result in diminished value for the entire conference.

The Big Ten Conference wants Notre Dame, Texas A&M, and UNC.

Notre Dame for sure. Not Texas A&M .. it’s not the flagship. UNC is a smaller school with fewer alumni and state politics won’t let them leave larger and more represented in the state assembly NC state behind in the bag of dicks ACC or Big 12.

Big Ten Conference does not want either U Arizona or U Colorado. Will result in diminished value for the entire conference.

The Big Ten Conference wants Notre Dame, Texas A&M, and UNC.

Anonymous wrote:Rutgers should change its name to the university of New Jersey. UNJ would be more descriptive and marketable.

They should go back to their original 1766 name: Queen’s College.

Rutgers should change its name to the university of New Jersey. UNJ would be more descriptive and marketable.

Currently Big 18.

Yeah. When you see the map it makes sense for the B1G to bring in Arizona and Colorado.

Pretty nice gotta admit

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Wob42UfUTIc





If not ND... should add Arizona and Colorado in the next round because...

1) Both AAU

2) Takes the mountain time zone for all day football TV

3) Connects all states coast to coast east to west

4) helps with scheduling for all sports

5) Locks the SEC into the Southeast permanently. and not a nationwide conference.