Anonymous wrote:Who approved subdividing that lot? That’s crazy. is the shared driveway even legal? No backyard? Someone was bribed. They are cheap and hideous. Is that cladding eifs? I didn’t even think that was legal here. They were slapped up for sure. Buyers will be idiots if they get these. Ridiculous developer greed. The neighbors must be outraged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect they hated their neighbors and wanted to tank their home value.
I suspect a developer offered them more money than they could get listing. The developer is going to make a fortune by subdividing the lots. They know that a SFH, no matter how narrow, is a much easier sell than a duplex, so they built these
I doubt it. People move to cc when they have kids and want good schools. Those triples are a terrible setup for a family, and there is very little yard. Everything about it is kid unfriendly. So who is your market? Dinks would rather live closer in for walkability. This was a mistake. It will have to be discounted substantially to move. But we’ll see I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect they hated their neighbors and wanted to tank their home value.
I suspect a developer offered them more money than they could get listing. The developer is going to make a fortune by subdividing the lots. They know that a SFH, no matter how narrow, is a much easier sell than a duplex, so they built these
Anonymous wrote:I suspect they hated their neighbors and wanted to tank their home value.