Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.
What does this have to do with the teachers union? They had nothing to do with it. Perhaps you can cite something that shows otherwise.
You don't think it's a coincidence they're going with half days, which are good for teachers, but terrible for kids and families?
The half days are because of Youngkin’s literacy act, not teacher unions.
Did that act specify half days to accommodate the training? No, it didn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.
This wasn't a union action-- it was decided before the collective bargaining agreement. It happened because elementary principals really pushed for it as a solution to the lack of planning time for elementary teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Starting a new thread because the existing early release Mondays thread seems to be cluttered with a number of topics now.
As are now in the second half of summer, has anyone heard more from their school directly about plans for early release Mondays, beyond the initial county announcements?
I’m waiting to find out which Mondays and any plans for after care for families not in regular after care. No communication yet from our school, curious about others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.
What does this have to do with the teachers union? They had nothing to do with it. Perhaps you can cite something that shows otherwise.
You don't think it's a coincidence they're going with half days, which are good for teachers, but terrible for kids and families?
The half days are because of Youngkin’s literacy act, not teacher unions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.
What does this have to do with the teachers union? They had nothing to do with it. Perhaps you can cite something that shows otherwise.
You don't think it's a coincidence they're going with half days, which are good for teachers, but terrible for kids and families?
The half days are because of Youngkin’s literacy act, not teacher unions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.
What does this have to do with the teachers union? They had nothing to do with it. Perhaps you can cite something that shows otherwise.
You don't think it's a coincidence they're going with half days, which are good for teachers, but terrible for kids and families?
Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.
What does this have to do with the teachers union? They had nothing to do with it. Perhaps you can cite something that shows otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:It sure didn't take long for the teachers union to screw us over.