Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a waste of money, you can just add an extra week of bow hunting and let the rednecks handle it. Too many deer caught at once in one area can really throw off a herd. Also if you hire people to cull the population in only one area then the other herds nearby will just spread out naturally in a couple years. They travel several miles, especially the bucks. Also how long are they doing this for? One night only we take them all out? Who is going to process all that meat? Will they waste it? Sounds like the people making these rules never watched a deer herd in their life.
All very good points! Arlington Co is full of ideas but rarely do they think them all the way through and then create another problem. This needs to be very carefully researched and the parties involved in making the decision need to thoroughly understand the downstream impact of their choices.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a waste of money, you can just add an extra week of bow hunting and let the rednecks handle it. Too many deer caught at once in one area can really throw off a herd. Also if you hire people to cull the population in only one area then the other herds nearby will just spread out naturally in a couple years. They travel several miles, especially the bucks. Also how long are they doing this for? One night only we take them all out? Who is going to process all that meat? Will they waste it? Sounds like the people making these rules never watched a deer herd in their life.
Anonymous wrote:And the sterilization program was a dismal failure. Look no one thinks you can kill large animals with no pain and we should do the best we can but some of them need to die. Do you think a lion is killing a gazelle without any pain?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The library had a program and a book talk. Apparently some culling operations in yards is via nets and bolt guns. Book described the "eee eee eee" cries of fawns being killed. It's not painless.
See The Age of Deer pp 190-194.
I am not supportive of culling 40% of the deer.
But I encourage supporters to be clear just what means are planned. Just sharpshooter and head shots? Or....????
Not in my yard.
You don't headshot a deer. The skull is quite thick and a small target
Well how do they get the instant, painless kills Arlington says will happen? Or is that bull?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The library had a program and a book talk. Apparently some culling operations in yards is via nets and bolt guns. Book described the "eee eee eee" cries of fawns being killed. It's not painless.
See The Age of Deer pp 190-194.
I am not supportive of culling 40% of the deer.
But I encourage supporters to be clear just what means are planned. Just sharpshooter and head shots? Or....????
Not in my yard.
You don't headshot a deer. The skull is quite thick and a small target
Anonymous wrote:The library had a program and a book talk. Apparently some culling operations in yards is via nets and bolt guns. Book described the "eee eee eee" cries of fawns being killed. It's not painless.
See The Age of Deer pp 190-194.
I am not supportive of culling 40% of the deer.
But I encourage supporters to be clear just what means are planned. Just sharpshooter and head shots? Or....????
Not in my yard.