Was the 2nd grader calling for jihad?jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.
Are you seriously attempting to justify an adult interrupting and intimidating a 2nd grader?
Anonymous wrote:So it would be wrong to interrupt anyone reading Kipling’s “the white Man’s burden”? That’s a very famous poem
so if a second grader read something anti lgbt you’d be upset if anyone interrupts?jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.
Are you seriously attempting to justify an adult interrupting and intimidating a 2nd grader?
Anonymous wrote:what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.
The poem was presumably vetted by the PTA or the administration. Further, you may not like CAIR but they are savvy political operators. They would not be setting this case alongside the attempted drowning of a Palestinian child in Texas if the poem were "calling for the destruction of Israel."
Anonymous wrote:so if it were vetted why as they mad at Mcps? Mcps is very left wing so the poem must have been very bad if Mcps isn’t siding with the Palestinian familyAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.
The poem was presumably vetted by the PTA or the administration. Further, you may not like CAIR but they are savvy political operators. They would not be setting this case alongside the attempted drowning of a Palestinian child in Texas if the poem were "calling for the destruction of Israel."
so if it were vetted why as they mad at Mcps? Mcps is very left wing so the poem must have been very bad if Mcps isn’t siding with the Palestinian familyAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.
The poem was presumably vetted by the PTA or the administration. Further, you may not like CAIR but they are savvy political operators. They would not be setting this case alongside the attempted drowning of a Palestinian child in Texas if the poem were "calling for the destruction of Israel."
Anonymous wrote:what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.
no idea but the fact CAIR doesn’t name it kinda indicates I’d we knew this heckling would likely be seen as less badAnonymous wrote:Does anyone know which poem was read?
what words did they read? Is it bullying if the readers were speaking words calling for the destruction of Israel? Why don’t they name the poem?Anonymous wrote:The big issue here isn't just that some bigot decided to engage in Islamophomic bullying, it's that the administration sat by and did nothing. There will always be bullies and bigots but when folks with power choose to side with them, then you have a court case on your hand.