Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.
What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.
NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas
![]()
Republicans out here telling us they think HIPAA is a joke. You guys don’t know or understand what “aggressive prosecution” is, it just seems to be “average prosecution [of your sacred cows].”
Look, I’m not taking a position on the substance. But what I am telling you is that it’s a political misstep and feeds into the narrative that the Democrats use censorship, misuse of the judicial system, and threats of prison to quell political dissent. I’m not a Republican, either, but I’m not willfully blind like a lot of Democrats are.
A big percentage of the country thinks that Trump was politically prosecuted. I don’t agree, but a lot of people believe this. Now you have the DOJ going after someone who was apparently earnestly trying to blow the whistle on what a lot of voters consider medicalized child abuse? It feeds into the existing narrative, and builds what OP is talking about.
Hyperventilating about how the prosecution is correct legally is useless and not helpful. Biden has a serious problem in how he is perceived and it’s time for Democrats to be realistic about that.
dp; I understood what you meant. I think that many democrats (like hyperventilating pp) choose to start complaining about republicans reflexively instead of discussing the issues on substance.
There has to be reasons why Trump is more trusted by the people sampled for this poll, and if people don’t want to discuss the possibilities, they should create their own thread to talk about Trump and republicans.
Anonymous wrote:Democrats have been a party of tyranny. Prosecute your opponents for long ignored missteps, while allowing your cronies to do the same thing. Everyone sees what’s going on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.
What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.
NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas
![]()
Republicans out here telling us they think HIPAA is a joke. You guys don’t know or understand what “aggressive prosecution” is, it just seems to be “average prosecution [of your sacred cows].”
Look, I’m not taking a position on the substance. But what I am telling you is that it’s a political misstep and feeds into the narrative that the Democrats use censorship, misuse of the judicial system, and threats of prison to quell political dissent. I’m not a Republican, either, but I’m not willfully blind like a lot of Democrats are.
A big percentage of the country thinks that Trump was politically prosecuted. I don’t agree, but a lot of people believe this. Now you have the DOJ going after someone who was apparently earnestly trying to blow the whistle on what a lot of voters consider medicalized child abuse? It feeds into the existing narrative, and builds what OP is talking about.
Hyperventilating about how the prosecution is correct legally is useless and not helpful. Biden has a serious problem in how he is perceived and it’s time for Democrats to be realistic about that.
Anonymous wrote:Democrats have been a party of tyranny. Prosecute your opponents for long ignored missteps, while allowing your cronies to do the same thing. Everyone sees what’s going on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.
What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.
NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas
![]()
Republicans out here telling us they think HIPAA is a joke. You guys don’t know or understand what “aggressive prosecution” is, it just seems to be “average prosecution [of your sacred cows].”
Anonymous wrote:I've lived here for the last 20 years so maybe January 6 is a more important issue to me than it is to the average swing state voter. Or maybe we're just in this unfortunate situation where no matter who's in charge, people are pissed off and look back fondly on the time when the other party was in power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.
What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.
NP. I’m not the PP but I am pretty convinced that the aggressive prosecution of Dr. Haim in Texas is a very serious political misstep by the Biden DOJ.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/doctor-charged-unauthorized-access-personal-information-pediatric-patients-texas
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.
What does Biden’s admin censor? Not trying to argue, just want your pov. Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Too much censorship with Biden’s admin? Doesn’t make me feel like they’re trustworthy.