Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The longer you own the hybrid, the more sense it makes. If you are the type that likes to replace your car every 5-9 years, then you get it if you want it, not for the savings. If you are the type to drive it into the ground and drive it until it can't be driven, then a hybrid makes more sense.
I had a Ford Escape Hybrid from 2006-2019. The hybrid cost about $9K more than the non-hybrid version (in 2006). I immediately got a $2300 tax credit because Ford still had tax credits available back then. I was driving about 16K-18K miles per year and was saving around $3K on gas because I was getting around 4mpg better gas mileage. So after 2.5 years, I had paid off the cost difference in gas savings. After that the $3K annual cost savings was all money saved.
In 2019, I bought a Toyota Highlander hybrid. It cost about $14K more than the non-hybrid model of the same. No tax savings anymore. I drive less now (about 14K-16K per year). I get about 3mpg better with the hybrid over the non-hybrid. But with the slightly higher gas prices now, I still save about $3K per year. So, in just under 5 years (e.g. earlier this year), I had paid off the cost difference of the vehicle in cost savings on gas. I am probably going to be keeping the car around another 9-10 years. So, at this point, all of the gas savings is money in my pocket.
We love our hybrids. Based on talks with friends, my next car is likely to be a plug-in hybrid. By that time, the kids will be grown and can probably downsize back to a small SUV (RAV4) or sedan.
Thanks, this is helpful. Do you find the Highlander hard to park (city
, parallel, tight parking lots, etc.)?
Anonymous wrote:The longer you own the hybrid, the more sense it makes. If you are the type that likes to replace your car every 5-9 years, then you get it if you want it, not for the savings. If you are the type to drive it into the ground and drive it until it can't be driven, then a hybrid makes more sense.
I had a Ford Escape Hybrid from 2006-2019. The hybrid cost about $9K more than the non-hybrid version (in 2006). I immediately got a $2300 tax credit because Ford still had tax credits available back then. I was driving about 16K-18K miles per year and was saving around $3K on gas because I was getting around 4mpg better gas mileage. So after 2.5 years, I had paid off the cost difference in gas savings. After that the $3K annual cost savings was all money saved.
In 2019, I bought a Toyota Highlander hybrid. It cost about $14K more than the non-hybrid model of the same. No tax savings anymore. I drive less now (about 14K-16K per year). I get about 3mpg better with the hybrid over the non-hybrid. But with the slightly higher gas prices now, I still save about $3K per year. So, in just under 5 years (e.g. earlier this year), I had paid off the cost difference of the vehicle in cost savings on gas. I am probably going to be keeping the car around another 9-10 years. So, at this point, all of the gas savings is money in my pocket.
We love our hybrids. Based on talks with friends, my next car is likely to be a plug-in hybrid. By that time, the kids will be grown and can probably downsize back to a small SUV (RAV4) or sedan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not really an apples to apples comparison. You need to look at the cost for a regular highlander versus the hybrid and compare your average yearly driving mileage. You can then calculate how much fuel savings you would have each year comparing the hybrid versus non and how long it will take to make up for the hybrid's higher initial purchase cost. Then, depending on how long you plan to have the vehicle, you will know when you start to "save" money on fuel costs.
It would be cheaper to buy the size car I want that’s not a hybrid, but I fear buyers regret once hybrids an EVs become more mainstream a few years down the road when charging infrastructure is more prevalent.
If we elect a new president, the charging in frastructute will not be happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not really an apples to apples comparison. You need to look at the cost for a regular highlander versus the hybrid and compare your average yearly driving mileage. You can then calculate how much fuel savings you would have each year comparing the hybrid versus non and how long it will take to make up for the hybrid's higher initial purchase cost. Then, depending on how long you plan to have the vehicle, you will know when you start to "save" money on fuel costs.
It would be cheaper to buy the size car I want that’s not a hybrid, but I fear buyers regret once hybrids an EVs become more mainstream a few years down the road when charging infrastructure is more prevalent.
If we elect a new president, the charging in frastructute will not be happening.
Anonymous wrote:Then just get a used hybrid. Since you only seem to be concerned about the cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not really an apples to apples comparison. You need to look at the cost for a regular highlander versus the hybrid and compare your average yearly driving mileage. You can then calculate how much fuel savings you would have each year comparing the hybrid versus non and how long it will take to make up for the hybrid's higher initial purchase cost. Then, depending on how long you plan to have the vehicle, you will know when you start to "save" money on fuel costs.
It would be cheaper to buy the size car I want that’s not a hybrid, but I fear buyers regret once hybrids an EVs become more mainstream a few years down the road when charging infrastructure is more prevalent.
Anonymous wrote:This is not really an apples to apples comparison. You need to look at the cost for a regular highlander versus the hybrid and compare your average yearly driving mileage. You can then calculate how much fuel savings you would have each year comparing the hybrid versus non and how long it will take to make up for the hybrid's higher initial purchase cost. Then, depending on how long you plan to have the vehicle, you will know when you start to "save" money on fuel costs.