Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NVSL reviews all the cards to make sure the times are entered in correctly - hence the 24 hour rule.
I used to think that was silly but this year we have had numerous issues with times being entered wrong and needing to be corrected.
22 events * 102 teams = 2,244 cards! How many people at the NVSL level are reviewing each and every one of those cards? I thought each division was responsible for verifying data accuracy, at the meet, hence the position of verifier.
They review the top 50 or so in each stroke.
They are verified at the meet and then again at the meeting that division coordinators attend. Mistakes are found but that’s why they double check.
Last year 1:17.96 was good enough for 70th place in boys 9-10 100 free relay, while 1:07.70 was 8th place. The additional NVSL level review you are describing doesn't guard against the case where someone fat fingers 1:07.70 into 1:17.70 and sends a team that was rightfully 8th outside of the scope of review for determining which teams ultimately make ASR.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NVSL reviews all the cards to make sure the times are entered in correctly - hence the 24 hour rule.
I used to think that was silly but this year we have had numerous issues with times being entered wrong and needing to be corrected.
22 events * 102 teams = 2,244 cards! How many people at the NVSL level are reviewing each and every one of those cards? I thought each division was responsible for verifying data accuracy, at the meet, hence the position of verifier.
They review the top 50 or so in each stroke.
They are verified at the meet and then again at the meeting that division coordinators attend. Mistakes are found but that’s why they double check.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NVSL reviews all the cards to make sure the times are entered in correctly - hence the 24 hour rule.
I used to think that was silly but this year we have had numerous issues with times being entered wrong and needing to be corrected.
22 events * 102 teams = 2,244 cards! How many people at the NVSL level are reviewing each and every one of those cards? I thought each division was responsible for verifying data accuracy, at the meet, hence the position of verifier.
Anonymous wrote:
NVSL reviews all the cards to make sure the times are entered in correctly - hence the 24 hour rule.
I used to think that was silly but this year we have had numerous issues with times being entered wrong and needing to be corrected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In NVSL, there is a 24 hour embargo on the results so team reps can have the relay all-stars meeting and certify the results before sharing them.
I don’t recall certifying anything as a team rep. There is an ASR seeding meeting Thursday night. The division coordinators release the results to the reps after that.
Anonymous wrote:In NVSL, there is a 24 hour embargo on the results so team reps can have the relay all-stars meeting and certify the results before sharing them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In NVSL, there is a 24 hour embargo on the results so team reps can have the relay all-stars meeting and certify the results before sharing them.
In this day and age, why is this necessary? All the data is in with multiple checks and it is just as accurate as A meet data and All Star results, all of which is immediately available.
Anonymous wrote:In NVSL, there is a 24 hour embargo on the results so team reps can have the relay all-stars meeting and certify the results before sharing them.