Jjhernandez wrote:My 12.5 year old son is showing signs of being in puberty such as a little bit of hair in the genital area. They did some tests and his testosterone levels are elevated, but what's concerning to pedo is that the bone age scan came back delayed being that of 10-11 years old. We are being referred to an endocrinologist and I am just nervous. Are the bone age scans usually accurate?
He isn't growing normally, his feet and hands seem to still be a smaller size. Has anyone experienced this?
Anonymous wrote:I’d definitely wait to see what the specialist says, and would not be worried at all at this point.
what is the growth issue? I assume that is why you did a bone scan?
Growth spurt comes later in puberty for a lot of boys FWIW. For example ped said my DS was in early puberty at 13yo appt (based on physical exam) but DS still outwardly looked like a little kid and definitely no growth spurt. It wasn’t until 14.5-15 that he started growing rapidly and looking more like a teen.
Jjhernandez wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jjhernandez wrote:Anonymous wrote:The bone age usually does not match up with stages of puberty. This is completely normal. What is the concern exactly? 12.5 is hardly early puberty.
Many kids are 1-2 years delayed bone age and the bone age readings are not exact. They are an estimate and the endocrinology may re-read the scans and give a completely different bone age.
She made it seem like having an elevated DHEA-S of 142 was not good with his bone age.
Is this a general practice pediatrician? If so, take everything they say with a grain of salt. Professionals will speak with an air of authority on topics they know very little about. The reason they hate google is you can easily walk into their office knowing more about a niche esoteric topic they last saw 15 years ago while studying for a licensing exam
Yes she is a general practice pediatrician.
How off are the bone scans when the endo doc reads them? Is it usually by a lot?
Anonymous wrote:Jjhernandez wrote:Anonymous wrote:The bone age usually does not match up with stages of puberty. This is completely normal. What is the concern exactly? 12.5 is hardly early puberty.
Many kids are 1-2 years delayed bone age and the bone age readings are not exact. They are an estimate and the endocrinology may re-read the scans and give a completely different bone age.
She made it seem like having an elevated DHEA-S of 142 was not good with his bone age.
Is this a general practice pediatrician? If so, take everything they say with a grain of salt. Professionals will speak with an air of authority on topics they know very little about. The reason they hate google is you can easily walk into their office knowing more about a niche esoteric topic they last saw 15 years ago while studying for a licensing exam
Jjhernandez wrote:Anonymous wrote:The bone age usually does not match up with stages of puberty. This is completely normal. What is the concern exactly? 12.5 is hardly early puberty.
Many kids are 1-2 years delayed bone age and the bone age readings are not exact. They are an estimate and the endocrinology may re-read the scans and give a completely different bone age.
She made it seem like having an elevated DHEA-S of 142 was not good with his bone age.
Anonymous wrote:The bone age usually does not match up with stages of puberty. This is completely normal. What is the concern exactly? 12.5 is hardly early puberty.
Many kids are 1-2 years delayed bone age and the bone age readings are not exact. They are an estimate and the endocrinology may re-read the scans and give a completely different bone age.
Anonymous wrote:The bone age usually does not match up with stages of puberty. This is completely normal. What is the concern exactly? 12.5 is hardly early puberty.
Many kids are 1-2 years delayed bone age and the bone age readings are not exact. They are an estimate and the endocrinology may re-read the scans and give a completely different bone age.
Anonymous wrote:I have a friend with a child who has a genetic disorder and frequent bone scans. The issue for them is the bone age being older than the child's age which indicates growth will stop too early. I'm no professional by any means, but it would seem that continuing to grow, although slowly, would be better than growth stopping altogether.