Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is where Trace is superior to Veo. Trace allows you to sync up iPhones anywhere from around the field. So you can get other side of the field shot and goal line shots. When you go to view the game, it will give you multiple angles. And the resolution is higher than I'm calling Kelly or not Veo or Trace regular camera.

Trace is fantastic.

My son is a GK and Trace stinks. He is always complaining it misses saves. I don’t know why this is but l have heard other GK parents complain as well. I wish I could afford a VEO because he needs good footage for recruiting. I’ve tried with my iPhone but he doesn’t like for me to be that close to the field.

I got Veo 1 for $200

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is where Trace is superior to Veo. Trace allows you to sync up iPhones anywhere from around the field. So you can get other side of the field shot and goal line shots. When you go to view the game, it will give you multiple angles. And the resolution is higher than I'm calling Kelly or not Veo or Trace regular camera.

Trace is fantastic.

My son is a GK and Trace stinks. He is always complaining it misses saves. I don’t know why this is but l have heard other GK parents complain as well. I wish I could afford a VEO because he needs good footage for recruiting. I’ve tried with my iPhone but he doesn’t like for me to be that close to the field.

I got Veo 1 for $200

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is where Trace is superior to Veo. Trace allows you to sync up iPhones anywhere from around the field. So you can get other side of the field shot and goal line shots. When you go to view the game, it will give you multiple angles. And the resolution is higher than I'm calling Kelly or not Veo or Trace regular camera.

Trace is fantastic.

My son is a GK and Trace stinks. He is always complaining it misses saves. I don’t know why this is but l have heard other GK parents complain as well. I wish I could afford a VEO because he needs good footage for recruiting. I’ve tried with my iPhone but he doesn’t like for me to be that close to the field.

Has anyone used Reeplayer? It seems like another less expensive option, but closer to Veo.

Anonymous wrote:These types of center pitch cameras are great for field players, but one player (the keepers) seem to be least advantaged by these camera systems. Any alternatives for “goalie cams”? I’ve wondered whether the VEO type systems would work well behind the keeper.

On the VEO website you can isolate the footage on the keeper. But most keeper parents just use a old school handicam isolated on their player.

Anonymous wrote:These types of center pitch cameras are great for field players, but one player (the keepers) seem to be least advantaged by these camera systems. Any alternatives for “goalie cams”? I’ve wondered whether the VEO type systems would work well behind the keeper.

As stated above, you can put an iphone on the GK / goal line angle and that will sync up with Trace. So, you get every movement of GK. But, in the sense that GKs don't benefit from stats such as top speed, stamina, etc...you are correct. Not as much value.

These types of center pitch cameras are great for field players, but one player (the keepers) seem to be least advantaged by these camera systems. Any alternatives for “goalie cams”? I’ve wondered whether the VEO type systems would work well behind the keeper.

Anonymous wrote:This is where Trace is superior to Veo. Trace allows you to sync up iPhones anywhere from around the field. So you can get other side of the field shot and goal line shots. When you go to view the game, it will give you multiple angles. And the resolution is higher than I'm calling Kelly or not Veo or Trace regular camera.

Trace is fantastic.

Can anyone confirm the price is $750 all in a year? Confused by the website. $400 for the GoPros?

We have used this system and it is far better than filming yourself or using one of the cheap "AI" gimbles. If that's what you are looking for, you will get a nice game video and highlight video and have 2 GoPros that you can use for anything else. Because GoPros shoot at such high resolution the video quality is very good.

It is not as full featured as a Veo or Trace, and if you are willing to spend the money, those are going to provide a more streamlined recording experience and a more fulsome poat-game viewing experience. But as a mid market option, SeeUsPlay is nice (and, as a bonus, the owner is based in VA and very responsive).

This is where Trace is superior to Veo. Trace allows you to sync up iPhones anywhere from around the field. So you can get other side of the field shot and goal line shots. When you go to view the game, it will give you multiple angles. And the resolution is higher than I'm calling Kelly or not Veo or Trace regular camera.

To be fair it was the other team putting the camera system up. The quality difference is when you are zooming in when editing video. Because the GoPro shoots in 5K you can zoom in a little bit more than a VEO and still be social media friendly. Small difference.

Doesn't look as good as the veo in terms of sharpness or following the action, but kudos to your team on developing an alternative.

Sample footage: https://youtu.be/GlMtV4Z-NCo?si=0ZechQ55YGgAWme0

Saw a dad use a “See Us Play” camera system yesterday. It’s two Go Pros synced through an app. Better image quality than a VEO but a little bit more work on game day because someone has to mark events in real time via an app. Goals, shots on goals, etc. A lot cheaper than a VEO at around 1k a year all in. All the clips end up on YT so you don’t have the interaction VEO offers.

Just sharing as another option.

IMO, VEO is still a better system overall especially if your coach, players, and families are all in with review/ tagging/ downloading clips/ using the analytics. But you’re paying for that functionality.