Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And in MCSL there are 2 heats of free. So 6 kids swim freestyle at every A meet, and free is not always the 3rd event for the fastest kids. Consider an example like this:
Fast kid A: back, breast, fly
Fast kid B: free, back, fly
Fast kid C: free, back, breast
Fast kid D: free, breast, fly
Still leaves 3 spaces in free only for other kids. And if any of my imaginary Fast kids above are only assigned two races, even more space for an additional kid.
MCSL says -up to- 3 events per kid, not counting IM or relays. A coach could conceivably do one event per kid and bring the entire age group to an A meet, but that would not maximize points. To win a dual meet you have to know (or have a pretty good guess) which of your swimmers can score in which events and plan from there. The times are scientific, yes, but knowing which events your fastest swimmers should -skip- is somewhat of an art.
For little ones I could see a coach not having a kid do back to back events (e.g., breast before fly) if it might make them tired for the last event if they weren't going to score points in the prior event anyways. Yes, they're short races but they're also little swimmers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And in MCSL there are 2 heats of free. So 6 kids swim freestyle at every A meet, and free is not always the 3rd event for the fastest kids. Consider an example like this:
Fast kid A: back, breast, fly
Fast kid B: free, back, fly
Fast kid C: free, back, breast
Fast kid D: free, breast, fly
Still leaves 3 spaces in free only for other kids. And if any of my imaginary Fast kids above are only assigned two races, even more space for an additional kid.
MCSL says -up to- 3 events per kid, not counting IM or relays. A coach could conceivably do one event per kid and bring the entire age group to an A meet, but that would not maximize points. To win a dual meet you have to know (or have a pretty good guess) which of your swimmers can score in which events and plan from there. The times are scientific, yes, but knowing which events your fastest swimmers should -skip- is somewhat of an art.
For little ones I could see a coach not having a kid do back to back events (e.g., breast before fly) if it might make them tired for the last event if they weren't going to score points in the prior event anyways. Yes, they're short races but they're also little swimmers.
Anonymous wrote:And in MCSL there are 2 heats of free. So 6 kids swim freestyle at every A meet, and free is not always the 3rd event for the fastest kids. Consider an example like this:
Fast kid A: back, breast, fly
Fast kid B: free, back, fly
Fast kid C: free, back, breast
Fast kid D: free, breast, fly
Still leaves 3 spaces in free only for other kids. And if any of my imaginary Fast kids above are only assigned two races, even more space for an additional kid.
MCSL says -up to- 3 events per kid, not counting IM or relays. A coach could conceivably do one event per kid and bring the entire age group to an A meet, but that would not maximize points. To win a dual meet you have to know (or have a pretty good guess) which of your swimmers can score in which events and plan from there. The times are scientific, yes, but knowing which events your fastest swimmers should -skip- is somewhat of an art.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So they look at the other team to see what they have.
So team A is seeding against team B.
Team A has a swimmer fast in Free, back and Breast but can only swim two events (NVSL).
Team B has a swimmer that can beat Team A's swimmer in Free. So Team A would not swim their fast swimmer in that event because they would be giving up points. They would swim them in Back and Breast.
It basically starts like this for each stroke. You work to to see what your lane one and lane two swimmers can do and sometimes you even have a great lane three swimmer. Sometimes you know that your lane three swimmer will not pick up points so you don't care who is in that slot and will just pick the next person down.
Team A's goal is to pick up points. They don't really care about the individual swimmers. Depending on where they put the top swimmers impacts those cusp swimmers. This weekend there are a lot of conflicts, so historically teams move further down the ladder in who swims.
This can make swimmers swimming this weekend think that they are A meet swimmers when they are not.
This is super helpful - thank you!! This is probably a dumb question but how do the coaches know the other team's swimmers times?
Anonymous wrote:
So they look at the other team to see what they have.
So team A is seeding against team B.
Team A has a swimmer fast in Free, back and Breast but can only swim two events (NVSL).
Team B has a swimmer that can beat Team A's swimmer in Free. So Team A would not swim their fast swimmer in that event because they would be giving up points. They would swim them in Back and Breast.
It basically starts like this for each stroke. You work to to see what your lane one and lane two swimmers can do and sometimes you even have a great lane three swimmer. Sometimes you know that your lane three swimmer will not pick up points so you don't care who is in that slot and will just pick the next person down.
Team A's goal is to pick up points. They don't really care about the individual swimmers. Depending on where they put the top swimmers impacts those cusp swimmers. This weekend there are a lot of conflicts, so historically teams move further down the ladder in who swims.
This can make swimmers swimming this weekend think that they are A meet swimmers when they are not.
Anonymous wrote:She’s 7 and you’re worried about this? I recommmend you relax. She will get her chances next year.