Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bicyclists can’t ever win with non-bicyclists. We don’t want them on our roads or our sidewalks, but they’ve got to ride somewhere.
Do they though? Do they have to?
Anonymous wrote:Bikes should yield to pedestrians on sidewalks as cars have to yield to bikes on the road - ringing the bell doesn't mean people need to leap into the bushes so bikes can keep pretending they are in the tour de france. In DC we couldn't teach our kids how to ride bikes on the paths and trails because the adult (mainly male) bikers were so insane
Anonymous wrote:Bicyclists can’t ever win with non-bicyclists. We don’t want them on our roads or our sidewalks, but they’ve got to ride somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m fine with bikes on sidewalks as long as they are moving at a reasonable speed and not going too fast.
I think it’s better and safer for them if they use the sidewalk alongside really busy roads rather than ride in the street. They just need to ride slower around people and give plenty of notice when they’re overtaking a walker.
Other than that, no issue with them.
I feel the exact same way. I rather have bikes on sidewalks then on the road because in my opinion, it’s safer.
Anonymous wrote:I’m fine with bikes on sidewalks as long as they are moving at a reasonable speed and not going too fast.
I think it’s better and safer for them if they use the sidewalk alongside really busy roads rather than ride in the street. They just need to ride slower around people and give plenty of notice when they’re overtaking a walker.
Other than that, no issue with them.
Anonymous wrote:illegal everywhere
Anonymous wrote:illegal everywhere