Anonymous wrote:True. My oldest didn’t make a first top mlsnext team until his senior year.
Went on to play pro- D1. The kids that stayed on those first teams in same from club u9-u18— for the most part none of them did anything after HS- only like 1 kid out of them went onto play in college.
It was the kids like mine that had to continually move around for development, continually got shafted and learned grit and to grind and had the benefit of many different coaches, rejections/failures, and come backs that succeeded. It was a pro team scout that ultimately found him—not a HS coach (cut him), not club team coach, etc. Parents that are quiet generally have kids like this—have to fight for everything themselves. Sucks going through it but so much better for them in the long run.
Anonymous wrote:No club has a system of players being moved down. If a club has 2-3 teams in the age group, clubs will not move a kid down. Now obviously you have things like chemistry and it is also based on positions, but if you have a tryout or a kid on the 2nd or 3rd team who improved a lot, if the team above has a full roster they won't be added. A shame clubs' administrations don't want to deal with that kind of parent backlash of their kid being moved down.
Anonymous wrote:I have seen kids moved down (cut) to make room for players joining from other clubs. They usually don't turn out to be any better. Most of the time the cut players leave for another club
Anonymous wrote:No club has a system of players being moved down. If a club has 2-3 teams in the age group, clubs will not move a kid down. Now obviously you have things like chemistry and it is also based on positions, but if you have a tryout or a kid on the 2nd or 3rd team who improved a lot, if the team above has a full roster they won't be added. A shame clubs' administrations don't want to deal with that kind of parent backlash of their kid being moved down.
Anonymous wrote:No club has a system of players being moved down. If a club has 2-3 teams in the age group, clubs will not move a kid down. Now obviously you have things like chemistry and it is also based on positions, but if you have a tryout or a kid on the 2nd or 3rd team who improved a lot, if the team above has a full roster they won't be added. A shame clubs' administrations don't want to deal with that kind of parent backlash of their kid being moved down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No club has a system of players being moved down. If a club has 2-3 teams in the age group, clubs will not move a kid down. Now obviously you have things like chemistry and it is also based on positions, but if you have a tryout or a kid on the 2nd or 3rd team who improved a lot, if the team above has a full roster they won't be added. A shame clubs' administrations don't want to deal with that kind of parent backlash of their kid being moved down.
Our club regularly moves kids down from the top team but more often, the family leaves. So if a club does that, they have to be willing to lose the family completely.
Anonymous wrote:No club has a system of players being moved down. If a club has 2-3 teams in the age group, clubs will not move a kid down. Now obviously you have things like chemistry and it is also based on positions, but if you have a tryout or a kid on the 2nd or 3rd team who improved a lot, if the team above has a full roster they won't be added. A shame clubs' administrations don't want to deal with that kind of parent backlash of their kid being moved down.