Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of this belt tightening will impact new hires (revoking ~200 open contracts), the rest can be absorbed by not filling all positions left by teachers who retired or left the system and forcing schools to shift around their staffing to do more with less.
Are they really going to revoke 200 offers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of this belt tightening will impact new hires (revoking ~200 open contracts), the rest can be absorbed by not filling all positions left by teachers who retired or left the system and forcing schools to shift around their staffing to do more with less.
Are they really going to revoke 200 offers?
Anonymous wrote:A lot of this belt tightening will impact new hires (revoking ~200 open contracts), the rest can be absorbed by not filling all positions left by teachers who retired or left the system and forcing schools to shift around their staffing todo more with less.
Teachers are amazing, but they can’t perform miracles. At a certain point the community has to demand better for kids and fund what schools need. Mcps doesn’t seem to care.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of this belt tightening will impact new hires (revoking ~200 open contracts), the rest can be absorbed by not filling all positions left by teachers who retired or left the system and forcing schools to shift around their staffing to do more with less.
Anonymous wrote:Trying to figure out the likelihood of being laid off. Conditionally certified teacher in good standing. Should I be looking for a new job?
Anonymous wrote:What do you teach? Core classes or electives?
Anonymous wrote:Trying to figure out the likelihood of being laid off. Conditionally certified teacher in good standing. Should I be looking for a new job?