Anonymous wrote:It’s a pretty simple choice. Go to NCSAs and finish 110th/200 at a boring meet far from home with no atmosphere. Or you could swim a local meet like all stars with passionate fans and a tight knit swim community rooting you on while you represent a TEAM, not a club. The choice is easy in my head.
If it was all stars vs juniors I’d say juniors 100%. But not for a nondescript meet like NCSA.
Anonymous wrote:If your swimmer enjoys summer swim and feels they can do both, let them. Olympians like Jack Conger and Andrew Seliskar managed to do both, so your kid could too. Let them have fun and enjoy the meets they like. It's possible to do both despite what club coaches or swim parents tell you. signed-non Olympic swimmer who managed to do both
Anonymous wrote:but to some, it's as important. If you look at all star results, you will see many ncsa level swimmers and faster that are competing
Anonymous wrote:but to some, it's as important. If you look at all star results, you will see many ncsa level swimmers and faster that are competing
Anonymous wrote:some elite swimmers also choose all stars over ncsa. i don't like the characterization that all stars is just "rec league"
Anonymous wrote:If your swimmer enjoys summer swim and feels they can do both, let them. Olympians like Jack Conger and Andrew Seliskar managed to do both, so your kid could too. Let them have fun and enjoy the meets they like. It's possible to do both despite what club coaches or swim parents tell you. signed-non Olympic swimmer who managed to do both