Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
$800 for how much coverage? Generally you can get $2m for less than $300. It’s actually the only insurance that I know of that gets more expensive per million as you go up. I pay $2088 for $10M
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
$800 for how much coverage? Generally you can get $2m for less than $300. It’s actually the only insurance that I know of that gets more expensive per million as you go up. I pay $2088 for $10M
Wow! Where did you get that insane rate? You must have no pets and no drivers on your cars. I was quoted much higher for 1 M. We had 2 teen drivers at the time and a dog. We don’t have a huge net worth so 1 M is plenty for us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
$800 for how much coverage? Generally you can get $2m for less than $300. It’s actually the only insurance that I know of that gets more expensive per million as you go up. I pay $2088 for $10M
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
Anonymous wrote:We are mid-late 30s, one child and network $1+. My calculations were if I die my spouse should be able to pay off the mortgage, take a few years off and pay for.mu kids college.thise Numbers came to $1m. I could get more but like you didn't want to over insure.