Anonymous wrote:Personally I think it's sexist, but I don't think it should be banned. However the subjects that they found for this article are insufferable. I almost have to believe it's satire because no self-respecting person would publicly have these opinions published.
https://slate.com/technology/2024/05/ivf-daughters-toxic-masculinity-sex-selection.html
Anonymous wrote:Medical reasons are legitimate.
I used to think I would want only girls in the future, because our oldest is a boy with autism and ADHD, and that profile is more commonly found in boys...
...but then our second, a daughter, was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease that our family is apparently predisposed to. Women are by far the main sufferers.
So now I suppose we shouldn't have any more children.
Sigh.
Anonymous wrote:We had to use IVF for infertility and we didn't want to know or choose sex.
Anonymous wrote:I mean women are the ones driving this. Women who want daughters are okay with putting up with the pain and suffering of another pregnancy to get one. They aren't willing to do that for a son if they already had daughters. If men could give birth, they might be okay with pain and suffering for a son.
It's okay really.