Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It'sba "non-recommended reduction." MCPS doesn't want this. They put out a budget proposal, the County Exec recommends a funding level to that (below for 2+ decades), the County Council holds hearings to see what would be left out based on that, and MCPS prepares these "non-recommende reductions" to let them know. Then it's on the Council to decide the ultimate funding level.
This. This was Felder saying to council: if you reduce the budget to the level the CE recommends, then we will have to do one of these three things, one of which is increase class sizes.
But not cut up their MCPS credit cards. Never!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It'sba "non-recommended reduction." MCPS doesn't want this. They put out a budget proposal, the County Exec recommends a funding level to that (below for 2+ decades), the County Council holds hearings to see what would be left out based on that, and MCPS prepares these "non-recommende reductions" to let them know. Then it's on the Council to decide the ultimate funding level.
This. This was Felder saying to council: if you reduce the budget to the level the CE recommends, then we will have to do one of these three things, one of which is increase class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:It'sba "non-recommended reduction." MCPS doesn't want this. They put out a budget proposal, the County Exec recommends a funding level to that (below for 2+ decades), the County Council holds hearings to see what would be left out based on that, and MCPS prepares these "non-recommende reductions" to let them know. Then it's on the Council to decide the ultimate funding level.
Anonymous wrote:There are so many other things to cut. This is bizarre this is what she'd choose.
Anonymous wrote:It just shows they would rather protect CO budget and other pet projects over our kids. They seriously can’t find any other funding to help address this? When was MCPS las audited?