Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming or running
I don't think of year round swim teams as particularly cheap. Not sky high expensive, but not cheap.
Anonymous wrote:Swimming or running
Anonymous wrote:Tennis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was having this conversation with friends and we were discussing what would be the lowest cost sport, assuming you are going beyond the rec level - so you are paying for coaching. My thought was running because the equipment is minimal (compared to hockey for example), you can do it almost anywhere (don't need to pay for field, ice, court time) and you are competing against the clock which is often available in all areas (i.e. minimizing travel). I know ALL sports can get $$$$$ at some point of course, wondering what others think.
I agree with track. Especially since most (all?) public HS around here are no cut on track, so get lots of practice time through HS.
Anonymous wrote:I was having this conversation with friends and we were discussing what would be the lowest cost sport, assuming you are going beyond the rec level - so you are paying for coaching. My thought was running because the equipment is minimal (compared to hockey for example), you can do it almost anywhere (don't need to pay for field, ice, court time) and you are competing against the clock which is often available in all areas (i.e. minimizing travel). I know ALL sports can get $$$$$ at some point of course, wondering what others think.