Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My impression having a kid at one and close friends at the other:
Linder is for kids with a diagnosis or two
Sycamore is for quirky kids
Both serve kids who fail to thrive at regular public/private.
There are downsides to each - really only worth considering if your kid is absolutely miserable elsewhere.
Correct that Sycamore works for kids who failed to thrive in bigger schools and has the limitations (and pluses) of a very small school.
Not correct that Sycamore kids don't have various diagnoses. The school is careful to accept the kids it can work with, so it's not for a full range or degree of learning challenges. That's why an interview is so useful.
Anonymous wrote:My impression having a kid at one and close friends at the other:
Linder is for kids with a diagnosis or two
Sycamore is for quirky kids
Both serve kids who fail to thrive at regular public/private.
There are downsides to each - really only worth considering if your kid is absolutely miserable elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:OP here—it wasn’t clear we could visit Sycamore, so we’re struggling to get a handle on it. They just have a zoom info session. Were folks able to go in person?
Anonymous wrote:OP here—it wasn’t clear we could visit Sycamore, so we’re struggling to get a handle on it. They just have a zoom info session. Were folks able to go in person?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Linder accredited yet?
That would be my fear if they ever do get a high school up and running? If your kid wants to attend college, are they even able to with a diploma from a unaccredited high school?
Anonymous wrote:Is Linder accredited yet?
Anonymous wrote:We’re trying to compare these schools for a middle schooler (or maybe just wait til high school). Recognizing that Linder doesn’t have a high school up and going yet, are there folks who have looked at both schools for middle—and, if so, why did you choose the one you did?