Anonymous wrote:Because you need to produce original research to get a PhD. You do not for a JD. That being said, JDs can and do teach in law schools. JD who are successful enough in government can pick their political science department if that is what they choose do do after retiring
Anonymous wrote:ABA governs the legal profession, not the academy in other fields. How is this even a question?
I have a trucker's license. Why can't I teach professional swimming?
Anonymous wrote:The ABA has noted that the JD and PhD are equivalent levels of education.
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/misc/legal_education/Standards/2013_2014_council_statements.authcheckdam.pdf
So why do political science departments consider one path of study (the PhD) more qualified than another (the JD)? The study of law should provide an adequate knowledge about American government, at the very least. In fact, I feel that with the study of law, one might even have a better understanding of government than in any other field, since American government is primarily based on the supreme law of the land, the United States Constitution.
Anonymous wrote:ABA governs the legal profession, not the academy in other fields. How is this even a question?
I have a trucker's license. Why can't I teach professional swimming?
Anonymous wrote:The ABA has noted that the JD and PhD are equivalent levels of education.
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/misc/legal_education/Standards/2013_2014_council_statements.authcheckdam.pdf
So why do political science departments consider one path of study (the PhD) more qualified than another (the JD)? The study of law should provide an adequate knowledge about American government, at the very least. In fact, I feel that with the study of law, one might even have a better understanding of government than in any other field, since American government is primarily based on the supreme law of the land, the United States Constitution.