Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judging engagement ring size is very petty on the sliding scale of female pettiness.
When someone has a small stone, I assume they married young or had other priorities.
The larger rings used to be more indicative of something about the finances of the couple, but the advent of lab-grown diamonds makes it impossible to know. So now I just think those larger rings suggest a need to show off. But don't actually convey anything financial about the owner.
My local CVS has some decent-looking large diamond engagement ring knockoffs (odd that they sell them there...isn't it?).
Hmm. There is that smugness OP's mom referenced. I just think those larger rings suggest the wearer thinks gems are pretty and that they enjoy sparkling jewelry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably true. I got the up and down eye by another mom today while grocery shopping and felt very insecure.
I thought about DCUM and how my frump was on full display at swim school this morning!![]()
Also, I may have been saying not nice things in my head about light make up, heels and jeans at 8:30 in the morning.
She is the insecure one, that is why she has the need to look at you that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judging engagement ring size is very petty on the sliding scale of female pettiness.
When someone has a small stone, I assume they married young or had other priorities.
The larger rings used to be more indicative of something about the finances of the couple, but the advent of lab-grown diamonds makes it impossible to know. So now I just think those larger rings suggest a need to show off. But don't actually convey anything financial about the owner.
My local CVS has some decent-looking large diamond engagement ring knockoffs (odd that they sell them there...isn't it?).
I know unmarried women in certain industries who buy those rings before they travel to conferences etc. in order to avoid being bothered.
Anonymous wrote:Judging engagement ring size is very petty on the sliding scale of female pettiness.
When someone has a small stone, I assume they married young or had other priorities.
The larger rings used to be more indicative of something about the finances of the couple, but the advent of lab-grown diamonds makes it impossible to know. So now I just think those larger rings suggest a need to show off. But don't actually convey anything financial about the owner.
My local CVS has some decent-looking large diamond engagement ring knockoffs (odd that they sell them there...isn't it?).
Anonymous wrote:Judging engagement ring size is very petty on the sliding scale of female pettiness.
When someone has a small stone, I assume they married young or had other priorities.
The larger rings used to be more indicative of something about the finances of the couple, but the advent of lab-grown diamonds makes it impossible to know. So now I just think those larger rings suggest a need to show off. But don't actually convey anything financial about the owner.
My local CVS has some decent-looking large diamond engagement ring knockoffs (odd that they sell them there...isn't it?).
Anonymous wrote:Probably true. I got the up and down eye by another mom today while grocery shopping and felt very insecure.
I thought about DCUM and how my frump was on full display at swim school this morning!![]()
Also, I may have been saying not nice things in my head about light make up, heels and jeans at 8:30 in the morning.
Anonymous wrote:I only judge the women who have those big, honkin’ rocks on their fingers. Too showy for me.