Anonymous wrote:graduating from IVY's matter if you want government policy job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
With holistic admissions and current preferences for athletes, first gen and pell grant eligible, this is not true, Lots if kids at T50 or even T75 who have stats for T20 but didn’t get in due to the aforementioned preferences, were hurt by average ecs, or college’s desire for geographical diversity.
The quality of the kid might be more similar.
But what firms are actually hiring from there? And what percentage of their starting first year analyst class is coming from a T75? I’d argue very few.
At the end of the day that’s what matters. All of the other stuff on this website is nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:Here we go again. Yo people are insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
With holistic admissions and current preferences for athletes, first gen and pell grant eligible, this is not true, Lots if kids at T50 or even T75 who have stats for T20 but didn’t get in due to the aforementioned preferences, were hurt by average ecs, or college’s desire for geographical diversity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
With holistic admissions and current preferences for athletes, first gen and pell grant eligible, this is not true, Lots if kids at T50 or even T75 who have stats for T20 but didn’t get in due to the aforementioned preferences, were hurt by average ecs, or college’s desire for geographical diversity.
Anonymous wrote:Do elite schools actually matter? Besides prestige and connections, what are the pros?
Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Quality of the peer group is vastly different vs. non T20 IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do elite schools actually matter? Besides prestige and connections, what are the pros?
I have heard from parents of MIT kids of them getting summer research internship and earning 50K over 3 months which pretty much covers the difference between in-state and out of state tuition (MIT does not give any merit based scholarship since it is pretty much the whole school; only need based scholarship). After graduation I have seen them earning twice more than my salary after 20 years of exp in IT. Lot of T20 school kids end up starting their own startups as well with their classmates. There is a reason why students and parents (like us) crave for top schools.
Anonymous wrote:Do elite schools actually matter? Besides prestige and connections, what are the pros?