Anonymous wrote:I don't like what the guy in the article did and I'm not a supporter of cancelling loans, but it seems like most of the balance was accruing interest, not principal. He had 250k in outstanding loans despite finishing his grad schooling in 1998. There was no way his education cost 250k in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Stop making moral judgments when critiquing policy decisions. For all you know the guy already paid the principal of the loan many times over.
Anonymous wrote:Stop making moral judgments when critiquing policy decisions. For all you know the guy already paid the principal of the loan many times over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew he had to get a better paying job to repay the loan, but he didn't want to give up his passion, which was music.
Now that his almost $250K loan has been paid by us taxpayers, he says he wants to go meditate in India with a guru.
Like what the actual f*.
my nephew has a mild SN and had a hard time finding a job after college; he majored in IT. He found a lowish paying job (like $45K) at a nonprofit and is still paying it off while he lives with his single mom because he can't afford to live on his own and pay off the debt. But, the government didn't pay his debt off. I think it's like $50K. Here's someone who's trying and working a job that has potential for growth, even as he has a hard time of it, and then there's this guy with his music passion, and now he can go meditate because we taxpayers basically gave him $250K.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/gen-xer-got-250-000-181801554.html
Yea, I feel bitter.
OP, you’re kind of being scammed here. You can write this kind of story about any kind of large policy change like this. If you went through all the businesses that got tax cuts in 2017, you’d find a lot to feel bitter about at a much larger scale. You just have to decide if the policy is worth it overall.
There’s no such thing as “loan forgiveness but not for lazy guru musicians.” You definitely don’t want the government to be making those kinds of judgements.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He knew he had to get a better paying job to repay the loan, but he didn't want to give up his passion, which was music.
Now that his almost $250K loan has been paid by us taxpayers, he says he wants to go meditate in India with a guru.
Like what the actual f*.
my nephew has a mild SN and had a hard time finding a job after college; he majored in IT. He found a lowish paying job (like $45K) at a nonprofit and is still paying it off while he lives with his single mom because he can't afford to live on his own and pay off the debt. But, the government didn't pay his debt off. I think it's like $50K. Here's someone who's trying and working a job that has potential for growth, even as he has a hard time of it, and then there's this guy with his music passion, and now he can go meditate because we taxpayers basically gave him $250K.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/gen-xer-got-250-000-181801554.html
Yea, I feel bitter.
OP, you’re kind of being scammed here. You can write this kind of story about any kind of large policy change like this. If you went through all the businesses that got tax cuts in 2017, you’d find a lot to feel bitter about at a much larger scale. You just have to decide if the policy is worth it overall.
There’s no such thing as “loan forgiveness but not for lazy guru musicians.” You definitely don’t want the government to be making those kinds of judgements.
Anonymous wrote:He knew he had to get a better paying job to repay the loan, but he didn't want to give up his passion, which was music.
Now that his almost $250K loan has been paid by us taxpayers, he says he wants to go meditate in India with a guru.
Like what the actual f*.
my nephew has a mild SN and had a hard time finding a job after college; he majored in IT. He found a lowish paying job (like $45K) at a nonprofit and is still paying it off while he lives with his single mom because he can't afford to live on his own and pay off the debt. But, the government didn't pay his debt off. I think it's like $50K. Here's someone who's trying and working a job that has potential for growth, even as he has a hard time of it, and then there's this guy with his music passion, and now he can go meditate because we taxpayers basically gave him $250K.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/gen-xer-got-250-000-181801554.html
Yea, I feel bitter.
Anonymous wrote:Stop making moral judgments when critiquing policy decisions. For all you know the guy already paid the principal of the loan many times over.