Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be comfortable with the rental but also do not love interest rates. I would personally truly break out costs for both and see which one you can tolerate. Also, can you get away with the new baby in your room for a bit to put off moving?
OP here. We do plan to have the new baby in our room for 4-6 months. I suppose they can share a room but it will be tight.
We absolutely love the building. My husband works from home and works in the work lounge, my work is a 10 minute walk, our nanny enjoys him the infant playroom ( never anyone else in there), we love the gym, it’s close to shopping, running trails, and restaurants. I feel very safe when he’s away on business. It fits our life very well.
I just wish we had more space because baby stuff makes things very cluttered.
We would spend more on a house with taxes but it’s an investment.
We have the means to afford our lifestyle.
This sounds terrible for the nanny. Having to move to another location in the building because of cramped living conditions? Husband having to work in a glorified wework?
Sorry but you’re used to suboptimal living conditions and paying $8k a month.
If you want an urban lifestyle like this you simply don’t have kids. Or you grow up and accept the reality and you move to the burbs like everyone else. The other option is you’re wealthy enough to live a nice lifestyle and doesn’t sound like you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be comfortable with the rental but also do not love interest rates. I would personally truly break out costs for both and see which one you can tolerate. Also, can you get away with the new baby in your room for a bit to put off moving?
OP here. We do plan to have the new baby in our room for 4-6 months. I suppose they can share a room but it will be tight.
We absolutely love the building. My husband works from home and works in the work lounge, my work is a 10 minute walk, our nanny enjoys him the infant playroom ( never anyone else in there), we love the gym, it’s close to shopping, running trails, and restaurants. I feel very safe when he’s away on business. It fits our life very well.
I just wish we had more space because baby stuff makes things very cluttered.
We would spend more on a house with taxes but it’s an investment.
We have the means to afford our lifestyle.
This sounds terrible for the nanny. Having to move to another location in the building because of cramped living conditions? Husband having to work in a glorified wework?
Sorry but you’re used to suboptimal living conditions and paying $8k a month.
If you want an urban lifestyle like this you simply don’t have kids. Or you grow up and accept the reality and you move to the burbs like everyone else. The other option is you’re wealthy enough to live a nice lifestyle and doesn’t sound like you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t need to move at all for a second baby. You already have 1500 sq feet.
+1. Stay where you are. You don’t need 3 bedrooms for 2 small kids. They can share a room.
Interest rates are awful right now so it’s not a good time to buy a home. Paying 10k for a 3bd rental also seems like a bad idea, financially.
OP here. We will be spending $2-3mil on a home and it will equal out. I still think we are throwing our money away.
My husband likes the convenience of everything. We have a Target across the street, Whole Foods two blocks away, multiple restaurants with a mile radius, our nanny lives within walking distance. There’s an excellent daycare with a mile of us if we ever go that route.
Buying a house would mean a large commute, added expenses with outsourcing, and having to find a new nanny.
I still hate that we are throwing away so much money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be comfortable with the rental but also do not love interest rates. I would personally truly break out costs for both and see which one you can tolerate. Also, can you get away with the new baby in your room for a bit to put off moving?
OP here. We do plan to have the new baby in our room for 4-6 months. I suppose they can share a room but it will be tight.
We absolutely love the building. My husband works from home and works in the work lounge, my work is a 10 minute walk, our nanny enjoys him the infant playroom ( never anyone else in there), we love the gym, it’s close to shopping, running trails, and restaurants. I feel very safe when he’s away on business. It fits our life very well.
I just wish we had more space because baby stuff makes things very cluttered.
We would spend more on a house with taxes but it’s an investment.
We have the means to afford our lifestyle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t need to move at all for a second baby. You already have 1500 sq feet.
+1. Stay where you are. You don’t need 3 bedrooms for 2 small kids. They can share a room.
Interest rates are awful right now so it’s not a good time to buy a home. Paying 10k for a 3bd rental also seems like a bad idea, financially.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t need to move at all for a second baby. You already have 1500 sq feet.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be comfortable with the rental but also do not love interest rates. I would personally truly break out costs for both and see which one you can tolerate. Also, can you get away with the new baby in your room for a bit to put off moving?
Anonymous wrote:You will spend $2000 on utilities for a 3 bedroom apartment?