Anonymous wrote:Bonus if attrition is broken out by gender. At the VA Tech revisit, we specifically heard more females than males leave the program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was just speaking to a female engineering major who transferred out of VT after Freshman year and went on a mini tirade about her poor treatment as a female there. I was really surprised.
Most colleges are accepting more females than males (60/40) in recent years. It stands to reason that there are more females than males admitted to engineering programs. STEM admits for females have been steadily preferred and rising Consequently, it should not be surprising that certain treatment still exists, however unfortunate.
I can tell you almost certainly that Engineering programs are still admitting more males then females. They would love to reach equilibrium but its just not possible right now.
+1. More males apply but less are admitted to bring the school to gender equilibrium.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bonus if attrition is broken out by gender. At the VA Tech revisit, we specifically heard more females than males leave the program.
Based on DC's engineering classes taken in HS, would argue best to separate males and offer female only classes. Male maturity level and ego can be much for female classmates, so not surprised with PP's tibit about VATech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bonus if attrition is broken out by gender. At the VA Tech revisit, we specifically heard more females than males leave the program.
Based on DC's engineering classes taken in HS, would argue best to separate males and offer female only classes. Male maturity level and ego can be much for female classmates, so not surprised with PP's tibit about VATech.
Hell no
Signed mother of 2 fabulous female engineers
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was just speaking to a female engineering major who transferred out of VT after Freshman year and went on a mini tirade about her poor treatment as a female there. I was really surprised.
Most colleges are accepting more females than males (60/40) in recent years. It stands to reason that there are more females than males admitted to engineering programs. STEM admits for females have been steadily preferred and rising Consequently, it should not be surprising that certain treatment still exists, however unfortunate.
I can tell you almost certainly that Engineering programs are still admitting more males then females. They would love to reach equilibrium but its just not possible right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bonus if attrition is broken out by gender. At the VA Tech revisit, we specifically heard more females than males leave the program.
Based on DC's engineering classes taken in HS, would argue best to separate males and offer female only classes. Male maturity level and ego can be much for female classmates, so not surprised with PP's tibit about VATech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was just speaking to a female engineering major who transferred out of VT after Freshman year and went on a mini tirade about her poor treatment as a female there. I was really surprised.
Most colleges are accepting more females than males (60/40) in recent years. It stands to reason that there are more females than males admitted to engineering programs. STEM admits for females have been steadily preferred and rising Consequently, it should not be surprising that certain treatment still exists, however unfortunate.
Anonymous wrote:I was just speaking to a female engineering major who transferred out of VT after Freshman year and went on a mini tirade about her poor treatment as a female there. I was really surprised.
Anonymous wrote:Bonus if attrition is broken out by gender. At the VA Tech revisit, we specifically heard more females than males leave the program.