Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought you were going to say last year you got 9k back (!!!!!) and this year you owed 6pm so you lost 1k. You didn’t. You made thousands more this year pre tax, and still have thousands more post tax. How are you worse off? Explain like I’m 7.
Then issue is that I literally worked TWICE as many hours this year as last year. Plus we spent 4k on summer childcare so that I would have the continuity required to do client work over the summer, which I did not do the previous year (I did some work over the summer, but had to turn down some projects because I was full time parenting much of the summer).
So between the 9k in additional taxes and the 4k in summer childcare, that's 13k. I made 16k more than I did the previous year. So total an extra 3k. To literally work twice as much.
Yes, I understand our increased tax burden is also partly due to my DH's raise. But my DH got a raise for doing the same job. He didn't get a promotion -- our family gets that money without him having to do a single second of extra work. Whereas my increase in income equals hours and hours of extra work, plus added expense (some of which is deductible but the childcare isn't).
So that's the issue. Yes we have more money this year than last. But we'd have a bit more money regardless of how much I worked because of DH's raise. I'm not suggesting I don't want him to get a raise. I'm questioning whether doubling my work efforts makes sense when so much of it gets instantly swallowed up by taxes and childcare costs.
Anonymous wrote:I thought you were going to say last year you got 9k back (!!!!!) and this year you owed 6pm so you lost 1k. You didn’t. You made thousands more this year pre tax, and still have thousands more post tax. How are you worse off? Explain like I’m 7.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. You need to know your and your DH’s tax liability. Is your DH withholding enough given your new family income?
???? OP needs to be making quarterly tax payments based on her revenues. This doesn't have anything to do with her husband's wage withholding.
It sounds to me like maybe she didn't make quarterly payments, her husband is still overwithheld, and they got lucky they didn't owe a lot more (and she probably owes or will owe penalties if she's not paying quarterly).
Anonymous wrote:NP. You need to know your and your DH’s tax liability. Is your DH withholding enough given your new family income?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing that's dumb is that you're presenting this argument in terms of your refunds for the respective years rather than your actual tax liabilities.
The refund is a shorthand for tax liability in this case because of how I do taxes as a freelancer who is married to someone who is not. For people who have taxes taken out of their paychecks, a refund just reflects your overpayment after deductions are applied. For a freelancer, the refund is a more direct reflection of tax liability because I have to pay my taxes, including payroll taxes, separately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The thing that's dumb is that you're presenting this argument in terms of your refunds for the respective years rather than your actual tax liabilities.
The refund is a shorthand for tax liability in this case because of how I do taxes as a freelancer who is married to someone who is not. For people who have taxes taken out of their paychecks, a refund just reflects your overpayment after deductions are applied. For a freelancer, the refund is a more direct reflection of tax liability because I have to pay my taxes, including payroll taxes, separately.
Anonymous wrote:The thing that's dumb is that you're presenting this argument in terms of your refunds for the respective years rather than your actual tax liabilities.
Anonymous wrote:The thing that's dumb is that you're presenting this argument in terms of your refunds for the respective years rather than your actual tax liabilities.