Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why even bother with this when they're just going to give the job to Felder?
This is a signal that they are not planning to do that.
Anonymous wrote:These search forms are political and obsolete. We have the Internet now. Board should put out an open call, and evaluate applicants. They shouldn't outsource the most important task to a non local third party business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These search forms are political and obsolete. We have the Internet now. Board should put out an open call, and evaluate applicants. They shouldn't outsource the most important task to a non local third party business.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:These search forms are political and obsolete. We have the Internet now. Board should put out an open call, and evaluate applicants. They shouldn't outsource the most important task to a non local third party business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pleasantly surprised they didn't use HYA again.
Me too. This seems like a good thing. Using a different vendor me yield a better outcome, and I'm not really bothered by that fact that they typically focus on higher education given how different MCPS is from most other K through 12 districts.
I'm also someone who has criticized the BOE pretty vociferously on this board, but one of the current board members working in education with someone who was hired through a search run by this firm in the past does not feel like a conflict of interest to me despite what the OP is suggesting.
Basically, this feels good, or at least better, and I'm not going to throw stones at what at least appears to be an attempt at transparency and change.
Anonymous wrote:Why even bother with this when they're just going to give the job to Felder?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pleasantly surprised they didn't use HYA again.
Me too. This seems like a good thing. Using a different vendor me yield a better outcome, and I'm not really bothered by that fact that they typically focus on higher education given how different MCPS is from most other K through 12 districts.
I'm also someone who has criticized the BOE pretty vociferously on this board, but one of the current board members working in education with someone who was hired through a search run by this firm in the past does not feel like a conflict of interest to me despite what the OP is suggesting.
Basically, this feels good, or at least better, and I'm not going to throw stones at what at least appears to be an attempt at transparency and change.
Anonymous wrote:I'm pleasantly surprised they didn't use HYA again.