Anonymous wrote:The Banneker SAT scores listed there are from the 22-23 class. While that cohort was fabulous-- and sent plenty of kids to ivys-- they enrolled in Banneker before the move to the new building. In the new building, the school is attracting a broader student profile. Furthermore, while Walls may have higher average SAT scores it also has a significantly lower at-risk student body and since SAT scores correlate directly with household income it makes sense that those students would test higher. Meaning: it's not an attribute of the school's quality, it's an attribute of the school's higher SES families. (Walls at-risk = 12%; Bannekeru at-risk = 29%)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at the AP scores is depressing. I don't understand the idea of pushing kids who are going to get a 1 or 2 to take an AP. Is that really motivating somehow? Just seems like a waste of time and money, if not demoralizing to the kid.
The College Board says even when they don’t score high enough to earn college credit, kids who take AP courses do better in college.
https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/about-ap/start-expand-ap-program/expand-access/impacts
Anonymous wrote:Looking at the AP scores is depressing. I don't understand the idea of pushing kids who are going to get a 1 or 2 to take an AP. Is that really motivating somehow? Just seems like a waste of time and money, if not demoralizing to the kid.
Anonymous wrote:Looking at the AP scores is depressing. I don't understand the idea of pushing kids who are going to get a 1 or 2 to take an AP. Is that really motivating somehow? Just seems like a waste of time and money, if not demoralizing to the kid.
Anonymous wrote:The Banneker SAT scores listed there are from the 22-23 class. While that cohort was fabulous-- and sent plenty of kids to ivys-- they enrolled in Banneker before the move to the new building. In the new building, the school is attracting a broader student profile. Furthermore, while Walls may have higher average SAT scores it also has a significantly lower at-risk student body and since SAT scores correlate directly with household income it makes sense that those students would test higher. Meaning: it's not an attribute of the school's quality, it's an attribute of the school's higher SES families. (Walls at-risk = 12%; Banneker at-risk = 29%)
Anonymous wrote:If you’re not a fan of SAT scores, use the AP scores as a guide since those test reflect content learned in the high school classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Look up DCPS SAT scores. I think on the DCPS site. There's a spreadsheet. You can also find AP scores. Walls is the only school that's just across the board higher. JR is obviously huge and high-variance.
Anonymous wrote:They list the college destinations in a document you can find on their website.