Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a fun thread. I hope more people are able to chime in.
It just seems like an excuse for people to feel smug and superior about schools that seem to be doing "yield protection."
But of course we're not the admissions offices, and who knows – it's possible that many rejected applications at the lower-ranked schools had very little effort put into them, and the AOs could tell. They know what they're doing, and they can tell when a student is treating them as a safety they really have no interest in.
Anonymous wrote:Don't answer with stories or reasons why this happens. I'm only asking for something like this:
- I know a kid who was rejected to [above 50th ranked school], but also accepted to [top 30 school].
Anonymous wrote:Rejected at an ≈100th ranked school
Accepted at ≈30th & 40th in the national rankings plus top of one of the regional USNWR lists.
I don't believe it was yield protection like PP claims.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a fun thread. I hope more people are able to chime in.
It just seems like an excuse for people to feel smug and superior about schools that seem to be doing "yield protection."
But of course we're not the admissions offices, and who knows – it's possible that many rejected applications at the lower-ranked schools had very little effort put into them, and the AOs could tell. They know what they're doing, and they can tell when a student is treating them as a safety they really have no interest in.
Anonymous wrote:This is a fun thread. I hope more people are able to chime in.
Anonymous wrote:My kid's friend was rejected from Univ. of North Dakota but in at WashU RD