Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:5 offers DS 2010 ASA MLSN, Achilles MLSN, Arlington ECNL and Bethesda MLSN, rejected SYC MLSN their team standing below locals.
SYC is by far the best 2010B team in the area.
I think this is definitely correct. I'm discounting Bethesda because three of their 2010s are actually 2009s.
But . . . you need to take into consideration the way SYC plays, to know whether it's the best choice for your son. This season, I've seen them play three times. SYC has the best athletes and is the most physical team in the area, outside of DC United, Loudoun (? I can't remember), and maybe Villareal. Their players are excellent, for the most part. They are skilled, aggressive, and fast. they press high man to man and win a lot of battles. Each time they were the dominant team, for sure.
But . . . most of the goals I saw came from corners and crosses. Although they'll occasionally reset through the keeper, but for the most part they play long goal kicks, long diagonal passes to isolate their wings, or individual runs up the sideline. There isn't a lot of play through the middle. It is a very direct style that relies on the superiority of their kids. It works well for them, but a lot of players would get lost in the shuffle.
You know what? I'd like to retract this one. In the interest of fairness and not wanting to have my anonymous self be wrong, I checked out parts of a few of the SYC 2010 youtube videos, and didn't see this as much. Definite attempts at build-ups, switches, etc. All of the matches I had seen previously were from the first month of the season and it looks like maybe the style was a function of it being so early.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:5 offers DS 2010 ASA MLSN, Achilles MLSN, Arlington ECNL and Bethesda MLSN, rejected SYC MLSN their team standing below locals.
SYC is by far the best 2010B team in the area.
I think this is definitely correct. I'm discounting Bethesda because three of their 2010s are actually 2009s.
But . . . you need to take into consideration the way SYC plays, to know whether it's the best choice for your son. This season, I've seen them play three times. SYC has the best athletes and is the most physical team in the area, outside of DC United, Loudoun (? I can't remember), and maybe Villareal. Their players are excellent, for the most part. They are skilled, aggressive, and fast. they press high man to man and win a lot of battles. Each time they were the dominant team, for sure.
But . . . most of the goals I saw came from corners and crosses. Although they'll occasionally reset through the keeper, but for the most part they play long goal kicks, long diagonal passes to isolate their wings, or individual runs up the sideline. There isn't a lot of play through the middle. It is a very direct style that relies on the superiority of their kids. It works well for them, but a lot of players would get lost in the shuffle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:5 offers DS 2010 ASA MLSN, Achilles MLSN, Arlington ECNL and Bethesda MLSN, rejected SYC MLSN their team standing below locals.
SYC is by far the best 2010B team in the area.
I think this is definitely correct. I'm discounting Bethesda because three of their 2010s are actually 2009s.
But . . . you need to take into consideration the way SYC plays, to know whether it's the best choice for your son. This season, I've seen them play three times. SYC has the best athletes and is the most physical team in the area, outside of DC United, Loudoun (? I can't remember), and maybe Villareal. Their players are excellent, for the most part. They are skilled, aggressive, and fast. they press high man to man and win a lot of battles. Each time they were the dominant team, for sure.
But . . . most of the goals I saw came from corners and crosses. Although they'll occasionally reset through the keeper, but for the most part they play long goal kicks, long diagonal passes to isolate their wings, or individual runs up the sideline. There isn't a lot of play through the middle. It is a very direct style that relies on the superiority of their kids. It works well for them, but a lot of players would get lost in the shuffle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:5 offers DS 2010 ASA MLSN, Achilles MLSN, Arlington ECNL and Bethesda MLSN, rejected SYC MLSN their team standing below locals.
SYC is by far the best 2010B team in the area.
I think this is definitely correct. I'm discounting Bethesda because three of their 2010s are actually 2009s.
But . . . you need to take into consideration the way SYC plays, to know whether it's the best choice for your son. This season, I've seen them play three times. SYC has the best athletes and is the most physical team in the area, outside of DC United, Loudoun (? I can't remember), and maybe Villareal. Their players are excellent, for the most part. They are skilled, aggressive, and fast. they press high man to man and win a lot of battles. Each time they were the dominant team, for sure.
But . . . most of the goals I saw came from corners and crosses. Although they'll occasionally reset through the keeper, but for the most part they play long goal kicks, long diagonal passes to isolate their wings, or individual runs up the sideline. There isn't a lot of play through the middle. It is a very direct style that relies on the superiority of their kids. It works well for them, but a lot of players would get lost in the shuffle.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:5 offers DS 2010 ASA MLSN, Achilles MLSN, Arlington ECNL and Bethesda MLSN, rejected SYC MLSN their team standing below locals.
SYC is by far the best 2010B team in the area.
Anonymous wrote:5 offers DS 2010 ASA MLSN, Achilles MLSN, Arlington ECNL and Bethesda MLSN, rejected SYC MLSN their team standing below locals.
Anonymous wrote:5 offers DS 2010 ASA MLSN, Achilles MLSN, Arlington ECNL and Bethesda MLSN, rejected SYC MLSN their team standing below locals.
Anonymous wrote:For those who has gone to ID sessions have you received an offer for next season yet? What about offers from your current club?