Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I disagree. Del Ray is the strong hold for the current mayor and council. That neighborhood, more than any other, should have to live with what they vote for. The world NIMBY is thrown around a lot in Alexandria and used incorrectly. But this really is NIMBY-ism. They support the policies and the politicians but then object when those policies come to their neighborhood.
Also, you forgot to list the new tacky "modern farmhouse" McMansions that are quickly taking the place of the bungalows and small houses that once made that neighborhood special.
+1. Del Ray is where virtual signaling thrives. All those people are super smug in their self righteousness, 100% support ANYTHING the mayor, city council, the city manager and ACPS do, and they shouldn’t get some free pass here.
I can't agree with you there. I was at the farmers market this gorgeous Saturday and a huge percentage of homes had STOP THE ARENA signs in their yards and there was a large group of people at the market passing out info on how it is a bad deal all around. The Post this am came out with obscene projection used to prop up the whole thing- like $750 a night hotels and $75 parking. That aint happening.
The mayor will end up with egg on his face with this one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I disagree. Del Ray is the strong hold for the current mayor and council. That neighborhood, more than any other, should have to live with what they vote for. The world NIMBY is thrown around a lot in Alexandria and used incorrectly. But this really is NIMBY-ism. They support the policies and the politicians but then object when those policies come to their neighborhood.
Also, you forgot to list the new tacky "modern farmhouse" McMansions that are quickly taking the place of the bungalows and small houses that once made that neighborhood special.
+1. Del Ray is where virtual signaling thrives. All those people are super smug in their self righteousness, 100% support ANYTHING the mayor, city council, the city manager and ACPS do, and they shouldn’t get some free pass here.
I can't agree with you there. I was at the farmers market this gorgeous Saturday and a huge percentage of homes had STOP THE ARENA signs in their yards and there was a large group of people at the market passing out info on how it is a bad deal all around. The Post this am came out with obscene projection used to prop up the whole thing- like $750 a night hotels and $75 parking. That aint happening.
The mayor will end up with egg on his face with this one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I disagree. Del Ray is the strong hold for the current mayor and council. That neighborhood, more than any other, should have to live with what they vote for. The world NIMBY is thrown around a lot in Alexandria and used incorrectly. But this really is NIMBY-ism. They support the policies and the politicians but then object when those policies come to their neighborhood.
Also, you forgot to list the new tacky "modern farmhouse" McMansions that are quickly taking the place of the bungalows and small houses that once made that neighborhood special.
+1. Del Ray is where virtual signaling thrives. All those people are super smug in their self righteousness, 100% support ANYTHING the mayor, city council, the city manager and ACPS do, and they shouldn’t get some free pass here.
I can't agree with you there. I was at the farmers market this gorgeous Saturday and a huge percentage of homes had STOP THE ARENA signs in their yards and there was a large group of people at the market passing out info on how it is a bad deal all around. The Post this am came out with obscene projection used to prop up the whole thing- like $750 a night hotels and $75 parking. That aint happening.
The mayor will end up with egg on his face with this one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I disagree. Del Ray is the strong hold for the current mayor and council. That neighborhood, more than any other, should have to live with what they vote for. The world NIMBY is thrown around a lot in Alexandria and used incorrectly. But this really is NIMBY-ism. They support the policies and the politicians but then object when those policies come to their neighborhood.
Also, you forgot to list the new tacky "modern farmhouse" McMansions that are quickly taking the place of the bungalows and small houses that once made that neighborhood special.
+1. Del Ray is where virtual signaling thrives. All those people are super smug in their self righteousness, 100% support ANYTHING the mayor, city council, the city manager and ACPS do, and they shouldn’t get some free pass here.
Anonymous wrote:I disagree. Del Ray is the strong hold for the current mayor and council. That neighborhood, more than any other, should have to live with what they vote for. The world NIMBY is thrown around a lot in Alexandria and used incorrectly. But this really is NIMBY-ism. They support the policies and the politicians but then object when those policies come to their neighborhood.
Also, you forgot to list the new tacky "modern farmhouse" McMansions that are quickly taking the place of the bungalows and small houses that once made that neighborhood special.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It wasn't the ADU that they turned down, it was building a house there period. It just so happened that the house came with an ADU as well. The was a whole bunch of weird stuff going on with the plan, some sort of a driveway situation, the house wasn't actually accessible from the street, and there was some flooding issues.
Sure, but that is all just noise. Does the city want to expand housing or not? The guy was trying to build on a vacant lot. It is true infill development. It would have been a +2. Insane that they would deny it.
They only want to expand housing when it benefits big developers who donate to their campaigns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It wasn't the ADU that they turned down, it was building a house there period. It just so happened that the house came with an ADU as well. The was a whole bunch of weird stuff going on with the plan, some sort of a driveway situation, the house wasn't actually accessible from the street, and there was some flooding issues.
Sure, but that is all just noise. Does the city want to expand housing or not? The guy was trying to build on a vacant lot. It is true infill development. It would have been a +2. Insane that they would deny it.
Anonymous wrote:It wasn't the ADU that they turned down, it was building a house there period. It just so happened that the house came with an ADU as well. The was a whole bunch of weird stuff going on with the plan, some sort of a driveway situation, the house wasn't actually accessible from the street, and there was some flooding issues.