Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the local soccer world be a better place if girls travel soccer was run exclusively by ECNL and boys travel soccer run exclusively soccer MLS?
(No GA, No Boys ECNL)
It would be nice if the ECNL would place current GA teams into their appropriate tier of ECNL (ECNL R?).
MLS needs a third tier below MLS Next (MLS R). The current boys ECNL clubs could vie for MLS next and MLS R spots.
It probably will never happen in my lifetime but one can always dream.
MLS already has a tier below MLS NEXT, it's NAL where the MLSN have their second teams play.
MLSN and NAL are completely separate leagues. The reason MLSN clubs put their 2nd team in NAL is because ECNL won't allow clubs to make boys ECNL teams 2nd behind MLSN. Clubs that have done this in the past get girls ECNL taken away or boys ECNL taken away the following season.
Tell me again how ECNL is the "solution" and not the problem.
Purely from a business perspective what ECNL is doing is illegal. Imagine if Hulu ever discovered that you had Disney+ that they'd drop your subscription. Or imagine of you wanted Netflix (girls ECNL) you have to buy Hulu (boys ECNL).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce)#:~:text=Tying%20(informally%2C%20product%20tying),a%20different%20product%20or%20service.
No idea what's going on with the formatting.
The more you know about youth soccer and leagues the less you want to know.
It's confusing and stupid. The problem is many people don't care about the details, history, and background. They just go after what the internet knuckleheads view the "best" which they primarily define by wins.
Unfortunately for the kids going for wins over everything else rewards the early developers and hurts skills development for everyone because of defined positions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the local soccer world be a better place if girls travel soccer was run exclusively by ECNL and boys travel soccer run exclusively soccer MLS?
(No GA, No Boys ECNL)
It would be nice if the ECNL would place current GA teams into their appropriate tier of ECNL (ECNL R?).
MLS needs a third tier below MLS Next (MLS R). The current boys ECNL clubs could vie for MLS next and MLS R spots.
It probably will never happen in my lifetime but one can always dream.
MLS already has a tier below MLS NEXT, it's NAL where the MLSN have their second teams play.
MLSN and NAL are completely separate leagues. The reason MLSN clubs put their 2nd team in NAL is because ECNL won't allow clubs to make boys ECNL teams 2nd behind MLSN. Clubs that have done this in the past get girls ECNL taken away or boys ECNL taken away the following season.
Tell me again how ECNL is the "solution" and not the problem.
Purely from a business perspective what ECNL is doing is illegal. Imagine if Hulu ever discovered that you had Disney+ that they'd drop your subscription. Or imagine of you wanted Netflix (girls ECNL) you have to buy Hulu (boys ECNL).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_(commerce)#:~:text=Tying%20(informally%2C%20product%20tying),a%20different%20product%20or%20service.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the local soccer world be a better place if girls travel soccer was run exclusively by ECNL and boys travel soccer run exclusively soccer MLS?
(No GA, No Boys ECNL)
It would be nice if the ECNL would place current GA teams into their appropriate tier of ECNL (ECNL R?).
MLS needs a third tier below MLS Next (MLS R). The current boys ECNL clubs could vie for MLS next and MLS R spots.
It probably will never happen in my lifetime but one can always dream.
MLS already has a tier below MLS NEXT, it's NAL where the MLSN have their second teams play.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the local soccer world be a better place if girls travel soccer was run exclusively by ECNL and boys travel soccer run exclusively soccer MLS?
(No GA, No Boys ECNL)
It would be nice if the ECNL would place current GA teams into their appropriate tier of ECNL (ECNL R?).
MLS needs a third tier below MLS Next (MLS R). The current boys ECNL clubs could vie for MLS next and MLS R spots.
It probably will never happen in my lifetime but one can always dream.
MLS already has a tier below MLS NEXT, it's NAL where the MLSN have their second teams play.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the local soccer world be a better place if girls travel soccer was run exclusively by ECNL and boys travel soccer run exclusively soccer MLS?
(No GA, No Boys ECNL)
It would be nice if the ECNL would place current GA teams into their appropriate tier of ECNL (ECNL R?).
MLS needs a third tier below MLS Next (MLS R). The current boys ECNL clubs could vie for MLS next and MLS R spots.
It probably will never happen in my lifetime but one can always dream.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok great ECNL “created” both “problems”.
ECNL can eliminate the GA problem just by showing that they are an irrelevant League. It would be nice if they would offer to place the remaining GA clubs in ECNL or ECNL R, whichever is appropriate based on their team quality and remaining players/coaches.
They should eliminate by ECNL boys problem by realizing that it is not a good look for ECNL to be running a second rate boys league. They should talk to MLSN about having all their boys clubs join as they will not be able to compete.
In Your make a wish dream you basically stumbled right into the main argument the #GAFTH clique are making on why ECNL would be first to fold simply cause it’s doing too much with trying to be a product for two different enough pathways. MLSN for boys - GA for girls. For our first timer on here which model makes sense to some one who knows nothing?
Anonymous wrote:Ok great ECNL “created” both “problems”.
ECNL can eliminate the GA problem just by showing that they are an irrelevant League. It would be nice if they would offer to place the remaining GA clubs in ECNL or ECNL R, whichever is appropriate based on their team quality and remaining players/coaches.
They should eliminate by ECNL boys problem by realizing that it is not a good look for ECNL to be running a second rate boys league. They should talk to MLSN about having all their boys clubs join as they will not be able to compete.
Anonymous wrote:Ok great ECNL “created” both “problems”.
ECNL can eliminate the GA problem just by showing that they are an irrelevant League. It would be nice if they would offer to place the remaining GA clubs in ECNL or ECNL R, whichever is appropriate based on their team quality and remaining players/coaches.
They should eliminate by ECNL boys problem by realizing that it is not a good look for ECNL to be running a second rate boys league. They should talk to MLSN about having all their boys clubs join as they will not be able to compete.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the local soccer world be a better place if girls travel soccer was run exclusively by ECNL and boys travel soccer run exclusively soccer MLS?
(No GA, No Boys ECNL)
It would be nice if the ECNL would place current GA teams into their appropriate tier of ECNL (ECNL R?).
MLS needs a third tier below MLS Next (MLS R). The current boys ECNL clubs could vie for MLS next and MLS R spots.
It probably will never happen in my lifetime but one can always dream.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the local soccer world be a better place if girls travel soccer was run exclusively by ECNL and boys travel soccer run exclusively soccer MLS?
(No GA, No Boys ECNL)
It would be nice if the ECNL would place current GA teams into their appropriate tier of ECNL (ECNL R?).
MLS needs a third tier below MLS Next (MLS R). The current boys ECNL clubs could vie for MLS next and MLS R spots.
It probably will never happen in my lifetime but one can always dream.
Anonymous wrote:I wish I knew what you were talking about…. ( parent of 11yo rec soccer player who grew up in a different country and has no clue about US soccer)