Anonymous wrote:The Paralympics is comparable to the Olympics. The special Olympics is a great organization, but is not at all similar to the Olympics, in function or intent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
That has nothing to do with the network’s equitable obligation to provide equal coverage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
That has nothing to do with the network’s equitable obligation to provide equal coverage.
Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Paralympics is comparable to the Olympics. The special Olympics is a great organization, but is not at all similar to the Olympics, in function or intent.
Yeah, it pisses me off that the paralympics aren't televised (at least on the spin-off channels) NBC last time had the rights to both the olympics and paralympics - which meant no one else could televise the paralympics - but as far as I know they failed to do anything, even on peacock or something like that.
Anonymous wrote:The Paralympics is comparable to the Olympics. The special Olympics is a great organization, but is not at all similar to the Olympics, in function or intent.