Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on *which* Syphax positions are cut. For instance, occupational therapists are technically “Syphax positions,” even though the OTs work in schools. So it depends…
Duran’s presentation specifies the positions that are proposed to be eliminated. They don’t appear to be student facing positions.
Most Syphax positions are not student facing. Most are just there to give schools more to do. 19 positions cut will have zero effect on schools.
More positions need cut. Too much bloat at Syphax!
They should also go back to their old leave schedule- no more FREE leave for Syphax folks!
Anonymous wrote:I am baffled at the proposed budget- 1% COLA and a step adjustment is absolutely inadequate, particularly when compared to FCPS's 6% increase on top of the 2% increase in Jan. How can the superintendent say that employee retention and compensation is a priority and then turn around and give teachers basically nothing. I am in a higher level step and my salary will increase by less than $2000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on *which* Syphax positions are cut. For instance, occupational therapists are technically “Syphax positions,” even though the OTs work in schools. So it depends…
Duran’s presentation specifies the positions that are proposed to be eliminated. They don’t appear to be student facing positions.
Most Syphax positions are not student facing. Most are just there to give schools more to do. 19 positions cut will have zero effect on schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on *which* Syphax positions are cut. For instance, occupational therapists are technically “Syphax positions,” even though the OTs work in schools. So it depends…
Duran’s presentation specifies the positions that are proposed to be eliminated. They don’t appear to be student facing positions.
Most Syphax positions are not student facing. Most are just there to give schools more to do. 19 positions cut will have zero effect on schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on *which* Syphax positions are cut. For instance, occupational therapists are technically “Syphax positions,” even though the OTs work in schools. So it depends…
Duran’s presentation specifies the positions that are proposed to be eliminated. They don’t appear to be student facing positions.
Anonymous wrote:It depends on *which* Syphax positions are cut. For instance, occupational therapists are technically “Syphax positions,” even though the OTs work in schools. So it depends…
Anonymous wrote:And Syphax laughs...